Understanding Democracy: Is It Empowering Individuals or Just a Facade?
The Essence of Democracy
The foundation of democracy revolves around individual freedom. While various governments may invoke social norms and cultural principles, true democracy aims to elevate its citizens by empowering them. This is its fundamental purpose.
In one of his essays, CS Lewis emphasizes that understanding the intended function of any object, from a corkscrew to a cathedral, is crucial for proper evaluation. Only after grasping its purpose can one critique its use. Misinterpretations arise when one assumes a corkscrew is for opening tins or a cathedral is merely a tourist attraction.
Viewing democracy solely as a series of elections is a fundamental misunderstanding. It transcends mere tribal conflicts over leadership. If a state stifles individual freedoms, it becomes indistinguishable from tyranny, regardless of whether it is an autocracy or a democratically elected government. The dissenting voice of a judge is vital in a democracy, as it serves to protect individual rights against state oppression. This may seem extreme, but in democratic frameworks, judges must act to free individuals from state tyranny, which often seeks to constrain personal freedoms.
Reflecting on current events in our nation can be distracting; instead, one should focus on the broader trends and potential for change. As a writer, the interest lies in observing how the populace reacts to state-induced shifts.
Delving into the specifics of these changes is often unnecessary, as they have been evident for over a decade and have received electoral endorsement. However, reviewing headlines can provide insight into whether these developments empower individuals and deepen democracy or lead to its erosion.
The state is steering us in a specific direction, and given the duration of this governance, we have moved beyond superficial changes. This trajectory is evident through recent legislation.
Consider the following laws: The Uttarakhand Freedom of Religion Act 2018, Himachal Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act 2019, Uttar Pradesh Vidhi Viruddh Dharma Samparivartan Pratibandh Adhyadesh 2020, Madhya Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act 2021, Gujarat Freedom of Religion (Amendment) Act 2021, Karnataka Protection of Right to Freedom of Religion 2022, and Haryana Prevention of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act 2022.
Additionally, there are laws such as the Maharashtra Animal Protection Act 2015, Haryana Gauvansh Sanrakshan and Gausamvardhan Act 2015, Gujarat Animal Preservation (Amendment) Act 2017, and Karnataka Prevention of Slaughter and Preservation of Cattle Act 2017.
Moreover, consider the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Amendment Act 2019, Right to Information (Amendment) Act 2019, Uttar Pradesh Recovery of Damage to Public and Private Property Act 2020, Temporary Suspension of Telecom Services (Public Emergency or Public Safety) Rules 2017, and Aadhaar And Other Laws (Amendment) Act 2019.
The years associated with these laws indicate a progression that has shaped our current reality. Behind the news headlines lies a robust legal framework that is now firmly established.
A well-managed tyranny can exist, as seen in various global examples, particularly in neighboring regions. Here, the management is primarily economic, compelling individuals to relinquish their autonomy and freedom, regardless of their desires.
Sadly, there are no instances of a thriving democracy under systemic oppression. The benefits of democracy arise from increased freedom, not its suppression. Acknowledging that free individuals are more productive, creative, and capable is essential.
The path away from this reality does not lead to success, unless success is defined as the systematic oppression of individuals and groups, and the satisfaction derived from such actions.
By Aakar Patel