Supreme Court to Hear WFI's Challenge on Vinesh Phogat's Asian Games Trials Participation

The Wrestling Federation of India has appealed to the Supreme Court against a Delhi High Court ruling that allows Vinesh Phogat to compete in the Asian Games selection trials. The Supreme Court's decision could significantly impact selection policies for athletes returning from breaks. The high court had previously criticized the WFI's exclusionary selection criteria, emphasizing the need for fairness and transparency in the trials. As the case unfolds, the implications for future athlete participation and selection norms remain to be seen.
 | 
Supreme Court to Hear WFI's Challenge on Vinesh Phogat's Asian Games Trials Participation gyanhigyan

WFI Appeals High Court Decision on Vinesh Phogat

Following the Delhi High Court's recent ruling permitting Vinesh Phogat to compete in the selection trials for the 2026 Asian Games, the Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) has filed an appeal with the Supreme Court against this decision.

The Supreme Court is set to hear the WFI's petition on Friday, presided over by Justice PS Narasimha and Justice Alok Aradhe.

This ruling from the apex court could have far-reaching effects on the selection criteria and the involvement of athletes who are making a comeback after a hiatus in high-performance sports.

On May 22, a Division Bench of the high court ruled in favor of Vinesh, allowing her to participate in the upcoming trials for the Asian Games. The court criticized the WFI's selection policy as being exclusionary, particularly for athletes like Vinesh who are returning from maternity leave.

Labeling Vinesh an “iconic athlete,” the high court emphasized the need for her to have a fair chance to compete and mandated her participation in the trials scheduled for May 30-31.

Additionally, the high court instructed that the trials be recorded on video by the WFI to ensure transparency, with independent observers from both the Sports Authority of India and the Indian Olympic Association present during the process.

In contrast, the WFI argued that adherence to established selection criteria is essential to uphold fairness and consistency in team selections.