Josh Inglis Set to Boost Lucknow Super Giants Ahead of Crucial IPL Matches
Lucknow Super Giants Struggling in IPL 2026
The Lucknow Super Giants (LSG) are facing challenges in the IPL 2026 season, currently sitting in 9th place on the points table with only two victories from six matches. Their performance has been inconsistent, both in batting and bowling. To improve their situation, a significant change is needed within the team. Fortunately, there is positive news as one of their key players is expected to return after missing the entire season so far.
Reports from ESPN Cricinfo indicate that Australian wicketkeeper-batter Josh Inglis is likely to rejoin the LSG squad before their match against the Mumbai Indians (MI) on May 4. This means LSG will have to compete in one more game without him, facing the Kolkata Knight Riders (KKR) on April 26. Inglis had previously mentioned that he would only be available for the latter part of IPL 2026 due to his wedding commitments. After marrying on April 18 in Australia, he is set to return to competitive cricket.
LSG acquired Inglis for a hefty sum of Rs 8.6 crore during the IPL 2026 auction.
Controversy Surrounding Josh Inglis's Availability
PBKS Express Discontent Over Inglis's Situation
According to a report by Cricbuzz, Inglis's wedding on April 18 was followed by a honeymoon, which initially limited his availability to the final matches of the league stage. However, following LSG's substantial bid, he may choose to delay his honeymoon and join the team right after his wedding.
Inglis's former team, Punjab Kings (PBKS), expressed dissatisfaction with the circumstances surrounding his release, which occurred just 45 minutes before the deadline. PBKS co-owner Ness Wadia criticized Inglis for his late notification regarding his unavailability, labeling it 'unprofessional.' He stated that the player informed them of his situation just before the deadline for submitting retained and released players on November 15.
Wadia remarked, 'We didn't really let go of Josh. Unfortunately, he only communicated his plans at the last minute, which was unfair considering his time with us. We were informed 45 minutes before the deadline that he was getting married and needed time off. He indicated he would only be available for a couple of weeks.' He added that it was not professional to inform a team so close to a deadline, especially when retention was expected.