Supreme Court Allows States to Withdraw FIRs Against NEET Protesters
The Supreme Court has ruled that state governments can withdraw FIRs against students involved in protests over the NEET paper leak, as long as it is done in accordance with the law. This decision, which clarifies previous statements, could provide significant relief for many students facing criminal charges. The court also indicated the possibility of forming a committee to investigate the issues surrounding these protests. The next hearing is scheduled for August 19, focusing on police actions against protesters and the use of pellet guns. This ruling aims to guide states and law enforcement on handling cases related to student demonstrations.
| Aug 3, 2026, 14:52 IST
Supreme Court's Clarification on NEET Protests
The Supreme Court clarified on Monday that state governments have the authority to dismiss or withdraw FIRs against students involved in nationwide protests against the NEET paper leak, provided such actions comply with the law. This statement came as the court reviewed multiple petitions related to student protests that occurred on July 20 at Jantar Mantar. The apex court emphasized that states can legally withdraw or dismiss criminal cases against student protesters where it is deemed appropriate, potentially paving the way for relief in several cases linked to these protests.
Court Limits Scope of Criminal History Considerations
The court also narrowed its previous remarks regarding criminal history, clarifying that this applies only to individuals accused of serious crimes such as murder, rape, terrorism, and other grave offenses. Consequently, students facing minor charges will not be classified as having a criminal history, allowing them to remain eligible for relief from the court. During the proceedings, the Supreme Court hinted at the possibility of forming a high-powered committee to investigate issues related to the protests.
The bench further expressed its intention to establish a comprehensive protocol for the use of pellet guns by law enforcement agencies. Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud stated that the court would determine the conditions under which pellet guns could be utilized. The Solicitor General representing the central government informed the court that "keeping the matter heated serves no purpose" and mentioned ongoing discussions with a lawyer representing the Cockroach Public Party. The government also assured the court of its commitment to the matter and indicated it would submit an affidavit.
Next Hearing Scheduled
The next hearing for this case is set for August 19. This matter pertains to police actions against students protesting alleged irregularities in competitive examinations at Jantar Mantar in Delhi. The Supreme Court is considering issues ranging from police actions and FIR registrations to accountability for the use of force and excesses against protesters. The clarification provided on Monday is expected to assist states and investigative agencies in managing cases against student protesters until a final resolution is reached.
Stay updated with the latest political developments and major news across the country.