Sunil Gavaskar Critiques ICC's Concussion Substitute Policy

Gavaskar's Concerns Over Concussion Rules

Sunil Gavaskar, the former captain of the Indian cricket team, has expressed significant concerns regarding the concussion substitute policy implemented by the International Cricket Council (ICC). In a recent interview, he claimed that the existing rule, which permits a like-for-like replacement for injured players, is being exploited, particularly in cases he labeled as 'incompetence.'

As outlined by a statement on Olymics.com, the current concussion substitute policy allows for a replacement if a player is diagnosed with a concussion or suspected concussion during a match, but this is subject to stringent conditions.

The issue gained attention when Rishabh Pant sustained a toe injury while attempting a reverse sweep against Chris Woakes, igniting a debate over the policy.

Despite his injury, Pant demonstrated his commitment to the sport by returning to bat on Day 2 and scoring a half-century, showcasing his resilience.

In an interview with Sony Sports, Gavaskar remarked, 'I have always believed that providing a like-for-like substitute for incompetence is problematic. If a player struggles against short-pitched bowling, perhaps they should consider other sports like tennis or golf instead of Test cricket.'

He further elaborated in the interview, stating, 'In Pant's case, it is a clear injury, and a substitute is warranted. I propose the formation of a committee to assess such situations. We want to avoid any perception, especially in the media, that decisions are being influenced by nationality. A dedicated committee, possibly including medical professionals, should be established to evaluate these injuries and make informed decisions.'

The ongoing debate surrounding the concussion substitute policy may intensify as discussions continue.