Six Sentenced for Wildlife Smuggling in Lucknow

In a significant ruling, a Lucknow court has sentenced six individuals to two years in prison for their roles in a wildlife smuggling case involving tiger and leopard body parts. The CBI's investigation revealed a large cache of illegal wildlife products, leading to the conviction under the Wildlife (Protection) Act. This case underscores the agency's commitment to combating wildlife crime and protecting endangered species. The verdict is expected to deter future offenses and support conservation efforts.
 | 
Six Sentenced for Wildlife Smuggling in Lucknow

Conviction in Wildlife Smuggling Case


Lucknow, March 31: A special court in Lucknow has sentenced six individuals to two years in prison and imposed a fine of Rs 10,000 each for their involvement in a wildlife smuggling operation that dealt with tiger and leopard body parts, as reported by officials on Tuesday.


The individuals convicted include Mumtaj Ahmad, Jaibun Nisha, Ajij Ullah, Waheed, Sartaj, and Majeed, with the court delivering its verdict on March 30.


This case stems from a significant seizure made during the investigation, where a substantial amount of illegal wildlife products was confiscated from the homes of the accused.


The confiscated items comprised 18,000 leopard nails, 74 leopard skins, four tiger skins, and bones from both tigers and leopards.


All these items are classified under Schedule I of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, which offers the highest level of protection and prohibits their possession, trade, and transportation.


The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) initiated the case on March 23, 2000, and submitted a charge sheet on July 15, 2000, after concluding its investigation. The inquiry confirmed the accused's participation in organized wildlife smuggling and illegal trade.


Based on the evidence provided, the court found all six guilty under Section 49B of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, in conjunction with Section 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 51 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act.


The CBI emphasized that this conviction underscores its ongoing commitment to tackling wildlife crime and dismantling trafficking networks. The ruling is anticipated to act as a deterrent against such illegal activities and support the conservation of endangered species.


The CBI remains proactive in investigating wildlife crimes, leading to various convictions, including fines and prison sentences.