Political Dynamics in Jammu and Kashmir: A Contrast Between Leaders

On July 13, 1931, 22 individuals lost their lives in Jammu and Kashmir, an event that continues to be commemorated politically. This year, due to restrictions, Chief Minister Omar Abdullah and other leaders from the National Conference, along with separatist figures, were unable to visit the cemetery. However, on July 14, Abdullah defied administrative barriers to pay his respects. Reports indicate that he clashed with police during this visit, labeling it an 'attack on democratic rights.'

Abdullah's actions appear to be part of a premeditated political narrative aimed at positioning himself and his party as the true voice of Kashmir. Ironically, the politics surrounding the 1931 incident seems disconnected from the current wounds of Jammu and Kashmir. It raises the question: have these leaders ever reached out to the families of those who have lost loved ones to terrorism? In contrast, Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha's approach stands out. While Abdullah engages in historical politics, Sinha is focused on healing the wounds of victims whose pain remains fresh. The moment when Sinha offered jobs to the families of 40 innocent victims of terrorism was profoundly emotional. This allocation of appointment letters signifies more than just a bureaucratic formality; it represents the restoration of trust that has been shattered for years.

Under Sinha's leadership, the administration is sending a clear message: Jammu and Kashmir will no longer be a land of mere political symbolism but will actively address the suffering of its victims and take concrete steps to restore their lives. This decision to provide jobs opens a new door of hope for thousands of families who have lost their loved ones to terrorism. It exemplifies humanity and good governance, rather than mere politics.

Meanwhile, Abdullah's attempts to portray himself as the true representative of the people through statements like 'we are not slaves' reflect an outdated political style that resonates less with today's Kashmiris. The people are now more interested in discussions about employment, education, security, and their future rather than the historical grievances that some leaders continue to exploit. The pressing question for Jammu and Kashmir is not who visited the cemetery or who was stopped, but rather who is creating opportunities for the youth who have lost their childhood to violence. Sinha's administration is taking practical steps towards building that future. His assertion that the days of providing jobs to the families of terrorists are over is significant. Sinha fulfilled his promise by handing out appointment letters to the victims' families within 15 days. He had met with these families on June 29 in Anantnag, assuring them that eligible members would receive jobs within 30 days. The administration is committed to reaching out to all families who have been waiting for justice for decades, ensuring jobs, rehabilitation, and livelihood opportunities. He also assured a thorough investigation into the cases of Kashmiri Pandits killed by Pakistan-sponsored terrorists.

In Jammu and Kashmir, a clear divide is emerging: on one side are leaders entangled in past politics, attempting to assert their presence through historical narratives, while on the other side is the Lieutenant Governor, focused on healing current wounds and improving the future. The public is increasingly aware of this distinction. During a recent event, individuals shared their experiences of losing loved ones to terrorism, exposing the realities of Pakistan-backed terrorism and its supporters.

Regarding Abdullah's outburst, he criticized the Lieutenant Governor and police for preventing him and his party from entering the martyr's cemetery. He also attacked local media outlets for their coverage of the events surrounding Martyrs' Day, suggesting it revealed who was cowardly and who was brave. On social media platform 'X', Abdullah stated, 'Look at our local newspapers in both English and local languages from Jammu and Srinagar. You can easily identify who is cowardly and who is courageous.' He accused local media of ignoring the fact that the elected government and most representatives were placed under house arrest on that day. Abdullah remarked, 'The cowards completely buried the truth that the entire elected government and most elected representatives were detained. Those newspapers that had a bit of courage reported it on the front page. Those who ignored this news should feel ashamed.'