Nagaland's New ILP Regulations Face Backlash from Locals and Tourists

Introduction to the New ILP System
Diphu, June 10: The recent implementation of the Inner Line Permit (ILP) system in Nagaland has ignited considerable discontent among both residents and visitors, primarily due to the steep fees and stringent requirements. Effective from September 20, 2024, the Nagaland government has enforced stricter regulations that many locals from surrounding areas, including Karbi Anglong, West Karbi Anglong, and Dima Hasao, deem unjust.
Increased Fees for Permits
A notification released on May 27, 2025, by the Deputy Commissioner of Dimapur revealed a significant hike in permit fees. Domestic tourists will now incur a charge of Rs 200 for a 30-day permit, a notable increase from previous rates, while foreign tourists will be required to pay Rs 300 for the same duration.
Impact on Small Traders and Labourers
Small traders and laborers are also feeling the financial strain, facing an annual fee of Rs 300 for new permits and Rs 150 for renewals. Laborers will pay Rs 150 for new permits and Rs 100 for renewals, while other professionals, including technical workers and educators, face even steeper fees, reaching Rs 1,500 for permits valid for two to three years. Business partners are particularly affected, needing to pay Rs 5,000 for a three-year permit, with renewals costing Rs 3,000. Critics argue that these expenses create barriers for low-income individuals seeking to visit or work in Nagaland.
Challenges in Documentation and Application Process
Adding to the challenges, the new regulations mandate various documents, such as Aadhaar cards, which many individuals, particularly migrant workers and students, may lack. This requirement complicates their ability to enter the state. Furthermore, obtaining a local guarantor for a permit incurs an additional fee of Rs 500 annually.
Since December 31, 2024, the previous offline application method has been discontinued, forcing individuals to navigate a complex online system. There is also ambiguity regarding exemptions for those who have resided in Dimapur since before December 1, 1963, leading to confusion and concerns about potential bias in enforcement.
Concerns Over Enforcement and Public Reaction
Residents and activists have voiced apprehensions regarding the enforcement of these new rules. Currently, only magistrates have the authority to impose fines for ILP violations, but the lack of clarity surrounding penalties raises fears of possible misuse by police during enforcement checks.
Reports of harassment have begun to surface, prompting worries about the adverse effects these changes could have on tourism and trade in Nagaland. Overall, the public response has been predominantly negative, with many urging the government to reconsider its stance.