Karnataka BJP Opposes Hate Speech Bill, Claims Violation of Constitutional Rights

The Karnataka BJP has formally opposed the Hate Speech and Hate Crime Prevention Bill, 2025, arguing that it infringes on constitutional rights and aims to suppress dissent against the Congress government. Leaders from the party presented a memorandum to the Bengaluru district commissioner, highlighting concerns over the bill's vague definitions and its potential to criminalize ordinary citizens. They warned that the legislation could stifle democracy by granting excessive powers to authorities, leading to the harassment of activists and journalists. This opposition reflects broader concerns about freedom of expression in the political landscape.
 | 
Karnataka BJP Opposes Hate Speech Bill, Claims Violation of Constitutional Rights

BJP's Opposition to the Hate Speech Bill

On Tuesday, the Karnataka BJP submitted a memorandum to the district commissioner of Bengaluru, expressing their opposition to the Hate Speech and Hate Crime Prevention Bill, 2025. The party contended that this legislation infringes upon constitutional rights and is designed to suppress criticism of the Congress government.


The memorandum was presented by BJP district leaders S. Harish (Bengaluru North), Satpagiri Gowda (Bengaluru Central), and C.K. Ramamurthy, the MLA from Bengaluru South. They asserted that the proposed bill contradicts the Constitution of India and urged that it should not be enacted.


BJP officials argued that the bill violates the freedom of expression guaranteed under Article 19(1) of the Constitution, accusing the Congress government of attempting to limit the freedoms granted by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar.


Concerns Over the Bill's Implications

Labeling the bill as a tool to silence dissent against the government, the BJP criticized the vague and uncertain definition of hate speech within the draft law. They warned that criticism of government policies, social discussions, satire, or even speaking the truth could be classified as hate speech.


The memorandum described the bill as an attempt to stifle democracy, claiming it grants excessive powers to the police and government.


Citing non-bailable provisions, the BJP questioned the necessity of such a low-level law that could criminalize ordinary citizens. They also criticized the preventive measures included in the bill, suggesting that officials could act based on the mere suspicion of potential offenses, indicating an intention to suppress protests, gatherings, and social movements. The party expressed concerns that activists, journalists, and social media users would face severe harassment.