Karnataka Assembly Passes Controversial Hate Speech Bill Amid Opposition Protests
Karnataka Assembly Approves Hate Speech and Hate Crime Prevention Bill, 2025
The Karnataka Assembly has passed the Hate Speech and Hate Crime Prevention Bill, 2025, despite strong opposition, leading to repeated disruptions in the house. Home Minister G. Parameshwara explained that there has been a significant rise in statements that harm society and can lead to severe consequences.
He highlighted the increase in murders, assaults, and growing social tensions, noting that many individuals have been making statements that hurt societal harmony. Parameshwara emphasized the need to address hate that arises from discrimination based on religion, caste, and gender. Reflecting on his personal experiences, he stated that exclusion and discrimination are not just mere words.
Personal Experiences Highlighted
Recalling his childhood, he mentioned instances where people would throw water at him on his way to school. He pointed out that despite the teachings of Basavanna, true equality has yet to be fully realized even after centuries. 'Dr. Ambedkar is universally accepted. We must implement the Constitution he provided us,' he stated.
While explaining the provisions of the Hate Speech and Hate Crime Prevention Bill, 2025, the Home Minister noted that the law aims to regulate individuals or organizations spreading hate through speeches, publications, or electronic media. He added that the bill would also apply to older publications, with penalties including imprisonment for up to seven years and fines ranging from ₹50,000 to ₹1 lakh.
Opposition Voices Concerns
Opposition leader R. Ashok criticized the bill, labeling it an attack on freedom of expression. He questioned the necessity of such legislation 75 years after independence and alleged that it could be misused to target individuals. Ashok claimed that the bill lacks provisions for bail and warned that journalists could also face imprisonment under this law. He cautioned that this bill has become a weapon for political retaliation, potentially punishing innocent individuals before any guilt is established.