India's Firm Stand Against Pakistan's Terrorism at UN Security Council

In a recent session at the UN Security Council, India delivered a strong message to Pakistan regarding its support for terrorism. India's Permanent Representative, P. Harish, emphasized that the Indus Water Treaty would be suspended until Pakistan ceases its terrorist activities. He criticized Pakistan's focus on irrelevant issues during discussions and questioned its commitment to democracy, citing the recent constitutional amendments that empower the military. Harish called for urgent reforms in the Security Council to enhance its effectiveness in maintaining global peace. This article delves into India's firm stance and the implications for international relations.
 | 

India's Strong Message to Pakistan


United Nations: During a recent Open Debate at the United Nations Security Council, India delivered a powerful message to Pakistan, emphasizing that it will not tolerate terrorism emanating from Islamabad and will respond decisively.


India's Permanent Representative, P. Harish, stated firmly, "India will counter Pakistan-sponsored terrorism in all its forms and manifestations with all its might."


In response to Pakistan's Permanent Representative Asim Iftikhar Ahmad diverting from the Security Council's topic of 'Leadership for Peace' to discuss the Indus Water Treaty, Harish remarked that the treaty would be suspended until Pakistan ceases its support for terrorism.


He highlighted that the treaty was established 65 years ago in a spirit of goodwill, but Pakistan has repeatedly violated its principles through wars and terrorist attacks that have claimed numerous Indian lives.


The recent Pahalgam terror attack, which involved the targeted killings of 26 civilians by Pakistan-backed terrorists, was cited as a significant factor leading to the suspension of the treaty.


Harish criticized Pakistan for its fixation on issues unrelated to the discussions at the UN, particularly its unwarranted references to Jammu and Kashmir.


He pointed out that a country like Pakistan, which is a non-permanent member of the Security Council, should not pursue a divisive agenda that undermines its responsibilities.


Harish also questioned Pakistan's commitment to democracy, referencing the recent 27th Amendment to its Constitution that consolidates military power over civilian governance.


He noted that Pakistan's former Prime Minister Imran Khan is imprisoned, and his political party has been banned, illustrating the country's disregard for democratic principles.


The 27th Amendment grants lifetime immunity to the Chief of Defence Forces, further entrenching military control over the political landscape.


While addressing Pakistan's provocations, Harish emphasized the need for effective leadership within the UN Security Council to maintain international peace and security.


He called for urgent reforms to make the Security Council more effective in addressing contemporary global challenges.


Criticizing the current Inter-Governmental Negotiations process as ineffective, he urged for a shift towards time-bound, text-based negotiations.


Harish advocated for enhanced representation from underrepresented regions in the UN's permanent and elected memberships.


As the UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres approaches the end of his term, Harish stressed the importance of a transparent election process for his successor, who should reflect the aspirations of developing nations.


He concluded by challenging the existing system of appointing top UN positions based on a 'division of spoils,' advocating for inclusive leadership that is representative and effective.