Delhi High Court Reserves Judgment on Kejriwal's Plea to Remove Judge in Excise Policy Case
The Delhi High Court is currently deliberating on a petition from former Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, who has requested the removal of Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma from the excise policy case. Kejriwal raised concerns about potential bias, claiming he felt unjustly accused. Justice Sharma acknowledged the unusual nature of the request and expressed her commitment to delivering a fair judgment. This case highlights the ongoing legal challenges faced by Kejriwal and the Aam Aadmi Party amidst serious allegations. Stay tuned for the court's decision.
| Apr 14, 2026, 17:11 IST
Judicial Decision Pending on Kejriwal's Request
The Delhi High Court has decided to reserve its judgment regarding a petition filed by former Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. He sought the removal of Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma from the hearing of the CBI's appeal in the excise policy case. Kejriwal, who is also the convenor of the Aam Aadmi Party, presented his arguments in court and submitted his application. As the hearing drew to a close, Justice Sharma acknowledged Kejriwal's strong arguments, suggesting he has the potential to become a lawyer. In response, Kejriwal expressed satisfaction with his approach, stating he has found his path. The judge remarked that it was the first time someone had requested her to recuse herself from a case.
Justice Sharma Reflects on the Unusual Request
According to Live Law, Justice Sharma mentioned that she learned a lot about the legal principles surrounding recusal. She noted that it was the first instance in her career where someone asked her to step aside from a case, and she hopes to deliver a fair judgment.
Kejriwal Raises Concerns Over Bias
In his presentation, Arvind Kejriwal expressed concerns regarding potential bias from Justice Sharma, who typically hears appeals filed by the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate. He informed the court that he felt nearly convicted and was on the verge of being labeled corrupt, with only sentencing pending. Kejriwal further explained that his request for the judge's recusal stemmed from a legitimate fear of not receiving a fair hearing.
