Controversy Surrounds Abu Salem's Emergency Parole Request

Debate Over Jail Regulations and Humanitarian Grounds Intensifies

The discussion regarding jail regulations and the humanitarian grounds for relief has once again gained momentum. In this context, a significant ruling has emerged concerning Abu Salem, the underworld figure convicted in the 1993 Mumbai bombings.

Maharashtra Government Grants Two-Day Emergency Parole

According to recent reports, the Maharashtra government has agreed to grant Abu Salem a two-day emergency parole to visit his family. This decision follows the death of his brother, Abu Hakim Ansari, who passed away last November. It is noteworthy that Salem had requested a 14-day emergency parole.

Court Hearing and Government's Stance

During the hearing of this petition, the state's chief public prosecutor, Mankuwar Deshmukh, informed the Bombay High Court that the government decided to allow only a two-day emergency parole after careful consideration. The bench, comprising Justice Ajay Gadkari and Justice Shyam Chandak, was also informed that Abu Salem is classified as an international criminal, thus he cannot be released without a security detail.

Objections Raised by Salem's Lawyer

Farhana Shah, representing Salem, expressed her objections to this ruling. She argued that traveling from Mumbai to Azamgarh in Uttar Pradesh to meet family and returning within two days is practically unfeasible. She highlighted that her client has been incarcerated for nearly 25 years and has only been granted short paroles for the deaths of his mother and stepmother.

Concerns Over Security Escort Costs

Additionally, the lawyer raised concerns regarding the expenses associated with the security escort, stating that it could amount to millions, which she deemed unreasonable. She urged the court to consider granting Salem parole on humanitarian grounds without the need for an escort.

Court's Decision and Future Proceedings

Currently, after hearing arguments from both sides, the court has postponed the case for a week, leaving the final decision pending. It is anticipated that the forthcoming ruling will clarify the direction of the entire matter.