Controversy Erupts in Lok Sabha Over Comments by SP MP on Jihad

A heated debate unfolded in the Lok Sabha as BJP MPs condemned Samajwadi Party MP Mohibullah Nadvi's comments regarding jihad, demanding an apology. Nadvi's remarks, made during a discussion on the Waqf (Amendment) Act, suggested that ongoing atrocities against Muslims could lead to jihad. BJP leaders firmly rejected these claims, asserting that the country operates under the Constitution and that communal discord would not be tolerated. Nadvi defended his statements, arguing that rejecting mockery against Muslims is also a form of jihad. This controversy highlights the ongoing tensions in Indian politics regarding communal issues.
 | 
Controversy Erupts in Lok Sabha Over Comments by SP MP on Jihad

BJP MPs Demand Apology from SP MP for Jihad Remarks

Members of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) have criticized the remarks made by Samajwadi Party MP Mohibullah Nadvi regarding 'jihad' in the Lok Sabha, calling for him to apologize. The controversy arose on the third day of the winter parliamentary session when Nadvi suggested that ongoing atrocities against Muslims in the country might necessitate jihad. Defending his comments made during a speech opposing the Waqf (Amendment) Act, Nadvi faced strong opposition from the BJP, which dismissed any claims of atrocities against Muslims.


BJP Leaders Respond to Nadvi's Comments

BJP MP Jagdambika Pal stated that any MP advocating for jihad should not hold a position in parliament. He emphasized that the country operates under law and the Constitution, questioning Nadvi's faith in the Indian Constitution. Pal noted that Nadvi was a member of the joint parliamentary committee that discussed the Waqf Act for 14 hours before its passage, and now he is disrespecting that law. He urged Nadvi to retract his statement and apologize, accusing him of inciting public unrest.




Another BJP MP, Darshan Singh Chaudhary, rejected claims of atrocities against Muslims, asserting that those promoting communal bias and unrest would face consequences. He declared that India in 2025, under Prime Minister Modi, is a safe place for all communities, and the government operates according to the Constitution. Chaudhary warned that those attempting to spread communal discord would not be spared, affirming that the nation will continue to function under constitutional principles.


Nadvi Defends His Statement

In response, SP MP Nadvi defended his comments, stating that rejecting the mockery faced by Muslims is also a form of jihad. Speaking to reporters outside Parliament, he insisted that he expressed what he needed to in the appropriate context. He criticized the media for ridiculing Muslims in the country, claiming it goes against the Constitution, morality, and patriotism. Nadvi highlighted that his community has made sacrifices for the nation over centuries, and when the media attempts to undermine a community's morale, boycotting such actions is also jihad. Therefore, he declared his intention to boycott the media.