Community and Environmentalists Rally Against Bijli Mahadev Ropeway Project in Himachal Pradesh

In Himachal Pradesh's Kullu valley, the proposed Bijli Mahadev Ropeway project faces fierce opposition from locals, environmentalists, and religious leaders. They argue that the project threatens a sacred pilgrimage site and the surrounding ecosystem. Former political leaders and community members unite to defend their traditions and environment, raising concerns about the project's environmental impact and the political motivations behind it. As tensions rise, the community calls for sustainable development alternatives that respect their heritage and ecological balance. This ongoing conflict highlights the intersection of faith, politics, and environmentalism in the region.
 | 
Community and Environmentalists Rally Against Bijli Mahadev Ropeway Project in Himachal Pradesh

Growing Opposition to the Bijli Mahadev Ropeway Project

In the serene Himalayas, surrounded by ancient deodar trees and deep-rooted traditions, a significant protest is unfolding. The Bijli Mahadev Ropeway project, heralded as a visionary initiative by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, is encountering fierce opposition in the Kullu valley of Himachal Pradesh. What started as minor discontent has transformed into a widespread movement, uniting villagers, priests, environmental advocates, and former political figures, all defending what they regard as the dignity of 'Dev Bhoomi.'


Local Leaders Speak Out Against the Project

Ram Singh, the former Chairman of Kullu APMC, has emerged as a prominent voice against the ₹274 crore initiative. In a passionate press conference, he asserted, "Bijli Mahadev is a sacred pilgrimage site, not a tourist destination. We will not permit this ropeway to be constructed under any circumstances. We stand with the deity's will and the people's wishes." He criticized elected officials who previously opposed the project but are now supporting it quietly, questioning, "If the community is against it and the deity has spoken out, who is this project truly for?" Singh also highlighted that 72 trees have already been cut down, with plans for 206 more, despite the area's vulnerability to landslides.


Environmental Concerns Intensify

Kullu, located in a seismically active and ecologically sensitive region, is at risk of severe environmental damage, according to local conservationists. The proposed ropeway's route traverses dense forests that serve as natural barriers against landslides. Megha Rana, a local environmentalist, expressed her concerns, stating, "This project threatens not just trees but an entire ecosystem, including sacred groves, ancient springs, and wildlife corridors." She noted that unusual soil erosion observed this monsoon indicates ecological instability.


Faith and Tradition at the Core of Opposition

In Himachal Pradesh, spiritual approval is as crucial as political endorsement. The Bijli Mahadev temple, situated at the confluence of the Beas and Parvati rivers, is believed to be under divine protection. Local oracles have consistently communicated that the deity disapproves of the ropeway. A temple priest involved in the consultations remarked, "We do not speak on our own. The deity has said no, and that should conclude the discussion." Faith leaders from surrounding villages have echoed this sentiment, indicating that the conflict extends beyond environmental issues to theological ones.


Project Background and Controversies

The ropeway project, valued at ₹274 crore, was inaugurated by Union Minister Nitin Gadkari on March 5, 2025, as part of the National Ropeways Development Program 'Parvatmala.' Civil works commenced on July 10, leading to controversy when images surfaced of former MP Maheshwar Singh, a known opponent of the project, attending the bhoomi pujan. Singh later clarified his stance, stating, "I have always opposed the ropeway project and will continue to do so. Sacred lands cannot be traded for tourism."


Officials Respond to Criticism

In light of the growing backlash, Reena Pawar, Project Director of the National Highways Logistics Management Limited, defended the project, asserting that it complies with all legal and environmental standards. "Forest clearance was obtained prior to land transfer. Each tree removed is accounted for under the Forest Corporation's oversight. Many of the viral images circulating are either outdated or unrelated to this site," she explained. However, local residents remain skeptical, citing increasing instances of floods, landslides, and disappearing springs as evidence of ongoing damage.


Political Fallout: BJP and Congress Under Scrutiny

Both the ruling BJP and the opposition Congress are facing backlash for their perceived shifts in stance regarding the project. Political analysts note that while some leaders advocate for the project citing tourism and job creation, others remain silent, which is seen as politically motivated. Ravi Sharma, a local shopkeeper, expressed feelings of betrayal, stating, "They protested alongside us last year. Now, they are siding with contractors." This political inconsistency has led to accusations of collusion with private developers at the expense of local traditions, ecology, and democratic processes.


Concerns Over Policy Changes

The Ministry of Environment's recent amendments to forest clearance regulations, which exempt ropeway projects from prior forest approvals, have raised alarms. Experts argue that this loophole undermines years of conservation efforts and paves the way for unchecked commercial exploitation of vulnerable hill regions. Retired IFS officer Rajendra Panwar warned, "This is not just a Kullu issue; it sets a dangerous precedent for hill states across India."


Seeking Sustainable Development Alternatives

Many locals are not opposed to development; rather, they advocate for sustainable alternatives. Suggestions include enhancing the existing trekking routes, improving eco-tourism infrastructure, and investing in remote areas like Pangi and Bara Bhangal, which remain isolated for extended periods. Sarita Thakur, a resident of Kharal Valley, questioned, "Why sacrifice a heritage forest for a 3-km shortcut when better roads and eco-friendly models can achieve the same goals?"


News Hub