Allahabad High Court Grants Relief to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Amid Legal Proceedings

The Allahabad High Court has provided significant relief to Swami Avimukteshwaranand by stopping his arrest, granting him interim protection until the next hearing. His disciple confirmed that the Swami continues his daily religious practices despite the allegations. As the court prepares to hear his anticipatory bail application, Avimukteshwaranand asserts that the truth will prevail, questioning the validity of the medical report linked to the accusations against him. This case has garnered considerable media attention, with many awaiting the unfolding developments.
 | 
Allahabad High Court Grants Relief to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Amid Legal Proceedings

Court Issues Interim Protection

In a significant development, the Allahabad High Court provided a major relief to Swami Avimukteshwaranand by halting his arrest on Friday. The court's ruling granted interim protection against coercive actions until the next hearing in the case. This petition for relief was filed amidst ongoing legal proceedings, and the bench instructed authorities not to take any immediate action against the Shankaracharya.


Hearing Scheduled for Anticipatory Bail

The Allahabad High Court is set to hear the anticipatory bail application for the saint around 3:45 PM on Friday. His disciple, Sanjay Pandey, mentioned that Avimukteshwaranand continued with his daily religious duties and performed his rituals as usual. A large number of media personnel were present at the ashram. Avimukteshwaranand stated that his lawyer was present in court and would present all evidence before the judge. He expressed confidence that falsehoods do not endure, asserting that those who fabricated the story are being exposed. As more people learn about this fabricated case, the truth will emerge.


Questioning Medical Report Claims

Addressing claims related to the medical examination report, he questioned how a medical report could establish involvement. He remarked that it has been alleged that the report indicates wrongdoing. While it may reflect someone's statement, the relevance of a medical report conducted after such a long time is questionable. He added that even if an incident had occurred, it does not automatically determine who was responsible. He emphasized, "A child who has never come to us cannot be easily linked to our name."