Pakistan's PM Condemns Regional Escalation Amid US-Iran Tensions

As tensions escalate in the Middle East due to the US-Iran conflict, Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has publicly condemned the situation while expressing solidarity with Gulf nations. His diplomatic stance, however, has drawn criticism for failing to directly address the role of the United States in the conflict. Opposition voices have challenged Sharif to confront the true oppressor, highlighting the contradictions in Pakistan's position as a peace mediator given its historical context. This article delves into the complexities of Pakistan's diplomatic response amidst a volatile regional landscape.
 | 
Pakistan's PM Condemns Regional Escalation Amid US-Iran Tensions

Pakistan's Stance on Middle East Conflict

On Saturday, as missiles were launched across the Middle East, Gulf nations found themselves entangled in the intensifying conflict between the US and Iran. In response, Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif utilized X to articulate his government's position. He stated, "I had a conversation with my esteemed brother, HRH Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, this evening to convey Pakistan's strong condemnation of the alarming regional escalation following the Israeli assault on Iran and the subsequent attacks in the Gulf region." He further emphasized, "Pakistan stands firmly with Saudi Arabia and our Gulf allies during this critical time. We are prepared to contribute positively towards peace and hope that the blessings of Ramadan will usher in calm and stability in our region."

Such diplomatic remarks are typical during regional crises, yet the reaction they elicited was anything but standard.


Criticism of Pakistan's Diplomatic Approach

'Identify the True Oppressor'

One of the most critical responses came from Ali Haider Zaidi, a member of the opposition PTI party, who challenged Sharif's statement by asking, "PM Sahib: Do you possess the courage to identify the true oppressor? Can you even name them? Or will you continue to propagate the Nobel Prize narrative and the tale of how Southeast Asia was 'saved,' without confronting the complete truth? True courage begins with naming the real oppressor, rather than merely flattering egos and offering embraces!"

This critique highlighted what many perceived as a significant flaw in Sharif's statement: it condemned the "escalation" and expressed solidarity with Gulf partners without explicitly naming the United States, whose military actions against Iranian territory initiated the current turmoil in the region. Others echoed this sentiment, pointing out the irony of Pakistan attempting to position itself as a mediator for peace in the Middle East, given its history of supporting terrorism. The notion of Islamabad seeking to foster stability abroad struck many observers as contradictory, to say the least.