The Debate on Journalism: State Control vs. Free Press in India

A Controversy in Palampur

S Gopal Puri

Dharamshala: In the serene town of Palampur, a significant controversy has erupted, not merely due to a vigilance sting operation or a bribe of ₹2 lakh, but concerning the very essence of a free and accountable press. Following the revelation of a local journalist, Amir Dogra, allegedly involved in a corruption scandal, social media was inundated with reactions. Journalists, content creators, and media analysts quickly engaged in discussions to clarify the difference between a 'journalist' and a 'vlogger.' However, amidst this discourse, a troubling question arose — who has the authority to determine who qualifies as a journalist in India?

Some suggested that the Information and Public Relations (IPR) Department could publish a list of accredited journalists or web platforms to establish legitimacy. Yet, this approach poses significant risks. If the government starts certifying journalists, it inadvertently assumes the power to disqualify them as well, potentially undermining the very democratic foundation it professes to uphold.

A journalist's identity is not defined by government endorsement but by public trust, ethical standards, and a steadfast commitment to truth. Journalism serves not as a state-sanctioned service but as the conscience of democracy, tasked with challenging authority, questioning power, and shedding light on injustice. When bureaucratic definitions dictate its credentials, the integrity of journalism is jeopardized.

Amidst this discussion, the ancient figure of Maharishi Narad was referenced — often in jest, but rarely with true understanding. Narad was not merely a passive messenger; in Indian spiritual lore, he is recognized as the first communicator, a divine seer who inspired sacred texts, guided seekers like Dhruv and Prahlad, and disseminated transformative wisdom. His dialogues were not for mere sensationalism but aimed at elevating truth. He embodies the timeless essence of a journalist dedicated to dharma.

Invoking Narad in conversations about journalism is not only fitting but also deeply significant. Journalism that is anchored in national interest, spiritual integrity, and social progress is not just valid; it is crucial.

As we navigate further into the digital and democratic era, we must choose: do we desire a press that informs and challenges, or one that conforms and appeases?

Ultimately, journalism will endure not through recognition but through courage. If the essence of the press embraces the spirit of Narad, it will not only report the truth but also awaken it.