Ranveer Singh Seeks Legal Relief Over Kantara Controversy
Ranveer Singh Takes Legal Action in Kantara Case
Bollywood actor Ranveer Singh has approached the Karnataka High Court to dismiss an FIR lodged against him regarding his comments and imitation of the Daiva character from Kantara: Chapter 1. This case has sparked significant legal and public discourse and was presented before a bench led by Justice M Nagaprasanna. Although Singh's legal representatives requested an expedited hearing, the court opted to adhere to standard procedures during the proceedings.
Ranveer Singh's Legal Challenge in the Kantara Case
The FIR against Singh was registered at the High Grounds Police Station in Bengaluru, citing violations under Sections 196, 299, and 302 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). The complainant, Prashanth Methal, a 46-year-old lawyer from Bengaluru, prompted Singh to file a petition to quash the FIR. In his appeal, Singh contended that his actions stemmed from admiration for actor-director Rishab Shetty and the film's compelling narrative. His legal team argued that his genuine appreciation had been 'unjustly interpreted as criminal behavior.' They also noted that Singh had already received two notices from the police regarding the same comments, creating undue pressure on him.
During the court session, Singh's attorneys requested a same-day hearing, citing the stress and reputational harm the actor was experiencing. However, Justice Nagaprasanna questioned the basis for such urgency, asking if expedited treatment should be granted solely because Singh is a prominent Bollywood figure, and whether similar considerations would apply to a Hollywood star. With the urgent request denied, the court scheduled the hearing according to the usual timeline.
Details of the Kantara Mimicry Controversy
The controversy erupted during the closing ceremony of the International Film Festival of India (IFFI) 2025 held in Goa. At the event, Singh reenacted a Daiva scene from the climax of Kantara: Chapter 1 while expressing admiration for Rishab Shetty and discussing the film's influence on him. He described the Chamundi Daiva sequence as one of his favorites from the film.
Following the viral spread of the clip, social media backlash ensued, with many accusing Singh of insensitivity towards the cultural and spiritual importance of Daiva rituals, particularly criticizing references that labeled the Daiva as a 'ghost.' Critics emphasized that Daivas are revered forest deities integral to local customs. The situation escalated when another clip surfaced showing Shetty advising Singh against mimicking the performance, further igniting online discussions and leading to the FIR's filing. In response to the backlash, Singh issued a public apology on Instagram, clarifying that his intention was to honor Shetty's 'incredible performance' and expressing deep respect for all cultures and traditions in India. He stated, 'If I’ve hurt anyone’s sentiments, I sincerely apologize.' The upcoming hearing at the Karnataka High Court is now highly anticipated, as it will determine the future course of this high-profile case, coinciding with Singh's preparations for the release of Dhurandhar: The Revenge.