Ramesh Sippy Reflects on Sholay's Enduring Legacy and Unseen Ending

Ramesh Sippy, the director of the legendary film Sholay, reflects on its lasting impact and reveals intriguing details about an alternate ending that was never released. In a candid interview, he discusses the film's unexpected success and the challenges faced with censorship. Sippy's insights provide a deeper understanding of the film's characters and the vision he had for its conclusion. This exploration of Sholay not only highlights its significance in Indian cinema but also invites fans to consider what might have been had the original ending been shown. Discover the secrets behind this iconic film and its director's thoughts on its legacy.
 | 
Ramesh Sippy Reflects on Sholay's Enduring Legacy and Unseen Ending

Ramesh Sippy's Cinematic Journey

Ramesh Sippy is renowned for directing several acclaimed films, including Andaz, Seeta Aur Geeta, and notably, Shakti. However, it is the iconic film Sholay that continues to define his legacy.


When asked about the film's lasting appeal, Sippy chuckles, stating, "What can we do? If Sholay is my most recognized work, then so be it. We never anticipated its enduring success. During production, our focus was solely on perfecting the film. We were aware of the strength of the characters crafted by Salim-Javed, but the level of affection for these characters, both major and minor, over decades was beyond our expectations."


The Original Ending of Sholay

In an exclusive conversation with Subhash K Jha, Sippy revealed a lesser-known aspect of Sholay. He mentioned that an alternate ending was filmed, where the character Thakur, portrayed by Sanjeev Kumar, kills Gabbar Singh (played by Amjad Khan) using spiked shoes, as he is unable to use his hands. However, the censor board deemed this conclusion too violent, necessitating a more subdued ending.


Sippy expressed that this change did impact the film's climax, questioning whether Gabbar Singh deserved any mercy after his heinous actions against the Thakur and his family. He believes that restoring the original ending would finally present audiences with his complete vision for the film.