Will the Indian Super League Survive? Government Steps In to Ensure Fair Play

The Indian government has pledged to intervene in the Indian Super League (ISL) to ensure its continuation and protect players from disadvantages. Following a failed bid for the league's commercial rights, the Supreme Court is involved in discussions about the future of the ISL. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta confirmed that the government is committed to finding solutions that comply with FIFA regulations. The court will reconvene in two weeks to further address the situation, while the AIFF prepares for a meeting to vote on constitutional changes regarding dual office holdings. This development raises questions about the future of football in India.

By Narendra Chaudhary Nov 21, 2025, 17:01 IST

Government's Commitment to Indian Super League

New Delhi: On Friday, the Indian government assured the Supreme Court of its involvement to guarantee that the Indian Super League (ISL), the premier football league in the country, proceeds without disadvantaging players.

The All India Football Federation (AIFF) reported on November 7 that it had not received any bids for the ISL's commercial rights, marking a significant setback as the deadline for submissions passed.

Following a failed tender process aimed at monetizing the ISL, a committee appointed by the court, led by retired Justice L Nageswara Rao, suggested finding a balance between the AIFF's authority and the commercial interests of potential bidders.

The committee's findings were presented to the Supreme Court after the tender for the ISL's commercial rights attracted no interest, leaving the national football federation in a challenging position.

During the hearing, Justices P S Narasimha and Joymalya Bagchi were informed by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta that the relevant minister is aware of the situation and emphasized the necessity of holding the ISL.

Mehta stated, "The government will ensure the ISL takes place and that players are not disadvantaged," while leaving the specifics of sponsorship and financing to the government.

The bench noted the importance of not giving the impression of government interference.

Mehta reiterated that the minister assured all actions would comply with FIFA regulations to avoid any conflicts.

He emphasized that the players are the ultimate beneficiaries and should not suffer due to a lack of sponsors or club owners.

The bench acknowledged Justice Rao's recommendations as potentially beneficial guiding principles for stakeholders to discuss further. The court plans to reconvene in two weeks to continue the proceedings.

Additionally, the AIFF has scheduled a Special General Body Meeting on November 24 to vote on a constitutional clause that prevents its officials from holding dual positions within the national and state bodies.

In an order dated October 15, the Supreme Court instructed the AIFF to adopt Article 25.3 (c) and (d) within three weeks, which prohibits executive committee members from holding office in state associations.

However, the court allowed the current AIFF executive committee to serve until the end of its term in September of the following year.