Shubman Gill's Captaincy Debut Overshadowed by Sock Controversy

Shubman Gill's debut as India's Test captain was marked by a stellar century, but his choice of black socks instead of the required white may lead to disciplinary action from the ICC. The regulations specify that players must wear white, cream, or light grey socks during Test matches. This incident raises questions about potential fines and the implications of clothing violations in cricket. As fans await the match referee's decision, the cricket community reflects on past instances of similar breaches. Will Gill face consequences for his sock choice, or will it be overlooked? Read on to find out more.

By Narendra Chaudhary Jun 21, 2025, 09:56 IST

Gill's Impressive Start as Captain

In his inaugural match as India's Test captain against England at Headingley, Shubman Gill showcased his batting prowess with a remarkable century. By the end of Day 1, he had led India to a solid score of 359/3. However, his performance may be marred by a potential disciplinary issue unrelated to his on-field skills.

The Sock Controversy

Gill opted for black socks instead of the customary white ones, which could lead to repercussions from the International Cricket Council (ICC). This deviation from the norm may result in a fine for the young captain.

ICC Regulations on Socks

According to the ICC's Clothing and Equipment Rules (Clause 19.45), players are required to wear white, cream, or light grey socks during Test matches. These regulations were updated in May 2023 based on recommendations from the Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC), which oversees cricket laws.

During the match, Gill was seen wearing black socks, a violation that could be classified as a Level 1 offence.

Previous Incidents of Sock Violations

This isn't the first time a player has faced consequences for clothing violations. In the 2016 Big Bash League, Chris Gayle was penalized for using a bat with a black blade, losing 10% of his match fee. Other players, including KL Rahul, Imam-ul-Haq, and Joe Root, have also been fined for similar breaches of ICC regulations.

Potential Consequences for Gill

The decision on whether Gill will face a fine lies with match referee Richie Richardson. If he deems the choice of black socks intentional, Gill could incur a penalty of 10% to 20% of his match fee.

Conversely, if it was an honest mistake or due to circumstances like wet white socks, he might escape without a fine. Ultimately, the referee will determine the intent behind the action.

Understanding ICC Offence Levels

The ICC categorizes offences as follows:

Level 1 Offence: Fines ranging from 0% to 50% of the match fee, along with possible demerit points.

Level 2 Offence: Fines between 50% and 100% of the match fee and/or a match ban, typically reserved for serious dress code violations or other misconduct.

Fans are now left to see if the ICC will take action against Gill or let the matter slide.