India's Test Defeat Raises Concerns Over Player Management Strategies

India's recent defeat at Lords against England has sparked a debate over the team's player management strategies, particularly under the leadership of Shubman Gill. Former cricketer Irfan Pathan criticized the cautious approach to workload management, suggesting it may hinder the team's performance. He compared the Indian strategy to that of England, where players like Ben Stokes and Jofra Archer showcased relentless effort without concern for workload. Additionally, Pathan pointed out the significant number of extras conceded by India, which could have impacted the match's outcome. This analysis raises important questions about how India approaches crucial Test matches.

By Narendra Chaudhary Jul 16, 2025, 12:08 IST

India's Heartbreaking Loss at Lords

India faced a disappointing defeat at Lords in the third Test against England, prompting discussions about the team's failure to secure a win despite being in a favorable position. This marks the second loss for India against England under the captaincy of Shubman Gill, leaving the visitors trailing 1-2 in the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy.

Irfan Pathan Critiques Workload Management

Irfan Pathan, a former Indian cricketer, pointed out the contrasting approaches to player workload management between India and England. India's leading fast bowler, Jasprit Bumrah, is set to participate in only three out of five Tests, a decision made to manage his workload. Pathan criticized this cautious strategy, suggesting it disrupts the team's momentum, especially when key players are rested.

Comparing Player Workload Approaches

Pathan highlighted Ben Stokes' impressive performance, where he bowled a demanding 9.2 overs on the fifth day without any mention of workload management. He remarked, "In India, we often discuss workload management, but during a match, that should not be a priority." He emphasized the need for players to give their all during crucial moments.

Concerns Over Extras Given Away

Additionally, Pathan raised concerns about the number of extras conceded by India during the match. In the third Test, India allowed 31 runs as extras in the first innings and 32 in the second, totaling 63 runs. He stated, "If India had given away fewer extras, the outcome could have been significantly better."