Controversy Erupts Over Pitch Quality in Ashes Series After Melbourne Test

The Melbourne Test in the Ashes series has sparked renewed debate over pitch quality, with former Indian cricketer Sunil Gavaskar criticizing the match referee and the pitch rating system. After the match concluded in just two days, Gavaskar humorously suggested that the pitch rating might be downgraded from 'very good' to 'good'. He pointed out the inconsistency in how pitches are rated based on the performance of batsmen and bowlers, highlighting a perceived bias towards bowlers. Additionally, he criticized the differing standards applied to pitch curators in Australia compared to those in India. This ongoing discussion raises important questions about the fairness and accuracy of pitch assessments in cricket.

By Narendra Chaudhary Dec 29, 2025, 21:49 IST

Debate on Pitch Quality Intensifies

Following the conclusion of the Melbourne Test in the ongoing Ashes series in Australia, discussions regarding the quality of the pitch have reignited. Former Indian cricketer Sunil Gavaskar has sharply criticized the match referee and the pitch rating system.

The Melbourne Test marked the second match of this series, which wrapped up in just two days. Prior to this, the Perth Test was played on a pitch that exhibited significant seam movement, making it challenging for batsmen to settle in. Despite these conditions, the match referee awarded that pitch a rating of 'very good', which raised eyebrows across the cricketing community.

Similarly, the situation in Melbourne was not much different, with a total of 36 wickets falling. In response, Gavaskar humorously suggested in his column that perhaps the term 'very good' might be downgraded to just 'good' this time. He remarked that there should be no surprise at this point.

According to reports, Gavaskar pointed out the inconsistency in pitch assessments, stating that when batsmen score runs, the pitch is deemed poor, yet when bowlers take wickets, the same pitch is praised as excellent. He highlighted this as a clear double standard, indicating a shift in favor of bowlers over batsmen.

He further criticized the leniency shown towards pitch curators in Australia, who are often forgiven for mistakes, while those in India face immediate scrutiny. Gavaskar labeled this as selective criticism.