Boris Gelfand Discusses Luck and Strategy in Chess Tournaments

Insights from Boris Gelfand on Chess Competitions

Boris Gelfand, who triumphed in the 2011 FIDE Candidates Tournament, recently shared his perspective on the significance of luck in chess, particularly in high-stakes events. He remarked, “This year’s Candidates might be the most captivating classical tournament. The Grand Swiss could be even more thrilling due to the larger number of games and participants. While there are certainly more than eight exceptional players globally, the Candidates remains a must-watch event, showcasing numerous remarkable games. Every competitor is highly driven, making it a joy to observe,” he stated in an interview with FIDE.com.

However, Gelfand expressed skepticism about making predictions in such an unpredictable environment. “I’m not fond of the notion of forecasting outcomes or trying to appear knowledgeable about what will transpire. Surprises are always part of the game. Perhaps it’s wiser to consult bookmakers, as they have a stake in their predictions. I don’t engage with bookmakers or wager on players, so I refrain from making comments on that front,” he explained.

He emphasized that factors beyond mere preparation often distinguish the top contenders. “Luck plays a significant role in every tournament, and this one is no exception. Luck can manifest not only through an opponent’s mistakes but also in the match pairings. You might encounter a player who has recently suffered a couple of losses, which could enhance your chances,” he noted.

Gelfand elaborated on the dynamics of risk-taking in the latter stages of tournaments. “Particularly in the second half, players tend to take greater risks because the gap between first place and the rest is substantial, much larger than the difference between second and last. Consequently, competitors will be more daring,” he added.

He recounted his own experience during the Candidates in Kazan. “A prime example is my victory in Kazan. In the quarterfinals, I secured a win against Shakhriyar with a commendable performance. However, in the semifinals against Gata Kamsky, after four classical draws and two rapid draws, I played one of my worst games in the third match with White, losing in about 20 moves, which forced me to win with Black to remain in contention.”

“Instead of opting for his usual London System, he chose the Open Sicilian. I consider that a stroke of luck, as I would have had minimal chances against Gata’s solid London System,” he reflected.

Despite the role of luck, Gelfand underscored the importance of preparation and maintaining peak performance. “Achieving peak form is essential. I recall feeling particularly clear-headed just days before that Candidates tournament, with some openings I analyzed leading to intriguing possibilities,” he shared.

“Being in good form is vital. The player who attains the best form holds a distinct advantage. However, it’s equally crucial to remain composed throughout the tournament. It’s rare for someone to win convincingly from start to finish; there will be fluctuations,” he added.

According to Gelfand, the mental aspect is as significant as preparation. “Remaining calm, determined, and focused in every situation is crucial,” he stated.

Reflecting on intense moments, he recalled, “I spent around 40 minutes contemplating during that game, delving deeply to uncover a brilliant strategic idea. The subsequent moves were even more challenging.”

He also praised the culture of respect prevalent in elite chess. “It was remarkable how warmly Alexander Grischuk congratulated me, as did Shakhriyar after the quarterfinal. Despite their strong desire to win, they exhibited great respect,” he noted.

“This serves as an important lesson for younger players: to honor the game of chess and treat it with the utmost reverence,” he concluded.