×

The Legacy of DOGE: Evaluating Its Impact and Future

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), initiated by President Trump, officially concluded on July 4, 2026. While it claimed to save $215 billion, critics argue these savings fell short of the promised $2 trillion. The initiative faced backlash for causing institutional damage and workforce reductions. Despite its expiration, officials assert that DOGE's principles will continue to influence government operations. This article delves into DOGE's promises, achievements, and the implications of its legacy.
 

Overview of DOGE's Conclusion

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), initiated by President Donald Trump at the beginning of his second term, officially concluded on July 4, 2026, as per the executive order issued in January 2025. Although the White House maintains that it will continue to pursue the objectives set by DOGE, officials have confirmed that there are no intentions to publish a final report assessing the initiative's overall effectiveness, savings, or operational expenses. During a House Appropriations hearing on June 30, lawmakers from both parties inquired whether Congress would receive a detailed account of DOGE's activities before its termination. OMB Director Russ Vought responded, stating, "We have no plans to do kind of a closing DOGE report," while asserting that the initiative had achieved "some really important strides."


DOGE's Initial Commitments

What Did DOGE Promise?

Established through an executive order, DOGE also rebranded the US Digital Service as the US DOGE Service. The order clearly indicated that this temporary organization would cease operations on July 4, 2026. In his announcement, Trump expressed that a more efficient government with reduced bureaucracy would be a fitting gift for America’s 250th anniversary. Elon Musk and former Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy were appointed to spearhead the initiative, with Musk later commenting on X, "The final step of @DOGE is to delete itself." DOGE aimed to reduce government expenditures by eliminating waste, cutting regulations, downsizing the federal workforce, canceling contracts and grants, and minimizing unnecessary office leases. The administration also highlighted aggressive deregulation, claiming to have removed 129 regulations for every new rule introduced.


Assessing DOGE's Achievements

Did DOGE Deliver on Its Promises?

DOGE claims to have saved $215 billion, which translates to about $1,335.40 per taxpayer, through actions such as canceling DEI grants, reducing redundant software licenses, and terminating leases for underutilized office spaces. However, critics contend that these savings were significantly less than the initially promised $2 trillion in cuts. With the federal budget now approximately $7 trillion annually, DOGE's reported savings represent only a minor portion of total government spending. Elizabeth Linos, a professor at Harvard Kennedy School, stated that the initiative inflicted lasting institutional harm rather than achieving meaningful reform. "Effectively, DOGE told the American people that they can't trust government to protect their data, to use their data and technology for good. That has really long-lasting effects on our ability to rebuild trust in government," she noted. Linos also pointed out that agencies lost expertise and capacity due to extensive workforce reductions, leading to increased wait times and diminished safety levels expected from the government.


The Aftermath of DOGE

DOGE oversaw one of the largest workforce reduction initiatives in recent federal history, with over 2 million federal employees receiving deferred resignation offers, and nearly 140,000 ultimately accepting, according to data from the Office of Personnel Management compiled in May. National Treasury Employees Union President Doreen Greenwald criticized DOGE, stating it "never proved its claims of savings or widespread waste, fraud, or abuse," and instead "caused chaos, disrupted lives, and made government work worse for the people it serves." Despite the official expiration of the temporary organization, administration officials assert that its principles will persist. OPM Director Scott Kupor recently remarked that while DOGE "may not have centralized leadership" anymore, "the principles of DOGE remain alive and well." Several former DOGE officials have transitioned into other government technology modernization roles, and the US DOGE Service continues to recruit technical talent despite the dissolution of the temporary organization.