Tamil Nadu Government Appeals Supreme Court Ruling on Vice-Chancellor Appointments
In response to a recent ruling by the Madras High Court that suspended the appointment of vice-chancellors in Tamil Nadu universities, the state government is set to appeal to the Supreme Court. This legal move follows the court's decision to challenge ten acts that granted the government this authority, previously held by the governor. The situation has sparked discussions about the implications of these amendments and their compliance with existing regulations. As the case unfolds, it raises questions about governance in higher education within the state.
May 22, 2025, 19:59 IST
Tamil Nadu Government's Legal Response
Following a directive from the Madras High Court that halted the implementation of ten acts allowing the Tamil Nadu government to appoint vice-chancellors in universities, the state has decided to appeal to the Supreme Court. This decision comes after the High Court ruled on a petition challenging these laws, placing a stay on their operational provisions. The state government had promptly notified these acts after the Supreme Court affirmed their validity on April 8, stating that the bills had received approval and were thus recognized as law.
Legislative Changes and Background
The Tamil Nadu government has enacted ten amendment acts that grant it the authority to appoint vice-chancellors (VCs) for state universities. Previously, this power primarily resided with the governor, who adhered to the guidelines set by the University Grants Commission (UGC). The government officially notified these amendments, which were published in the state gazette on April 11. DMK MP P. Wilson, also a senior advocate, mentioned that a lawyer associated with the BJP from Tirunelveli had approached the Madras High Court's vacation bench to file a petition, which was heard on May 14.
Legal Arguments and Current Status
Wilson stated that they argued there was no urgency in hearing the petition as it challenged existing laws, and the Supreme Court had previously dismissed the Attorney General's claim that the amendment acts violated UGC regulations. Similar cases are currently pending in the Supreme Court.