Supreme Court to Review Suitability of Jantar Mantar for Protests Amid Local Concerns

Supreme Court Takes Up Petition on Protest Venue

New Delhi: On Monday, the Supreme Court agreed to consider a public interest litigation (PIL) arguing that Jantar Mantar, located in the center of the capital, is no longer an appropriate site for protests due to the inconvenience it causes to local residents and the disruption of essential services.

A bench led by the Chief Justice, along with Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana, issued notices to the central government and other parties regarding the petition submitted by Satish Chand Kaushik. The court instructed Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to gather information from relevant authorities concerning the issues raised.

The petition advocates for an alternative location for protests, citing that demonstrations at Jantar Mantar hinder local residents and obstruct the delivery of essential goods and medical services.

During the hearing, the Chief Justice highlighted the petition's concerns about accessibility and movement in the vicinity.

The Chief Justice remarked, "The petition indicates that Jantar Mantar is no longer suitable for protests due to issues with access and the supply of medical essentials. This is a significant matter... Please gather instructions, Mr. Solicitor. Issue a notice and schedule this for a separate hearing."

The petitioner's counsel also mentioned a planned political march, stating that "Arvind Kejriwal organized a town hall and intends to march to the Prime Minister's residence," expressing the need to prevent a repeat of the events from July 20.

In response, the bench refrained from commenting on the proposed march, stating, "They know how to manage it. If they fail, they can approach us for assistance. I trust they will handle it effectively," said the Chief Justice.

The case has been scheduled for a separate listing.