Sonam Wangchuk's Comments Spark Debate Among CJP Leaders

A recent podcast featuring Sonam Wangchuk has ignited a debate regarding the political ambitions of leaders from the Cockroach People's Party (CJP). Following Wangchuk's comments, CJP head Abhijit Deepke responded, emphasizing that the conversation was misrepresented on social media. While Wangchuk praised the integrity of CJP leaders, he also noted that no one can guarantee their future behavior. This discussion has raised questions about the potential political direction of the student movement and the role of youth in politics. As the dialogue continues, both parties stress the importance of context in understanding their statements.

By Narendra Chaudhary Sep 2, 2026, 18:03 IST

Response from CJP Leader Abhijit Deepke

Social activist Sonam Wangchuk's remarks regarding the leaders of the Cockroach People's Party (CJP) have drawn a response from CJP head Abhijit Deepke. Following the viral spread of a portion of Wangchuk's statement on social media, Deepke asserted that the entire conversation was being misrepresented out of context. He emphasized that Wangchuk had made several positive comments about him and his colleagues, but the viral video focused primarily on a single aspect.

What Did Sonam Wangchuk Say?

During a podcast discussion, Wangchuk was questioned about the political ambitions and future of Abhijit Deepke and other CJP leaders. He was also asked whether these leaders could become corrupt in the future.

Wangchuk stated that he had closely observed these young individuals and currently saw no signs of corruption within them. He praised their potential and intentions but noted that one cannot guarantee how a person might change in the future.

According to Wangchuk, having political ambitions is not inherently wrong. He stressed the importance of directing the energy and aspirations of youth in a constructive manner.

Deepke's Response

In response to Wangchuk's comments, Abhijit Deepke expressed that he found nothing wrong in Wangchuk's statements. He reiterated that no one can guarantee a person's future.

Deepke mentioned that he often advises people not to trust anyone blindly, as it is impossible to predict how an individual will behave or what decisions they will make in the future.

He also pointed out that Wangchuk had said many positive things about him. According to Deepke, the majority of the conversation was filled with praise for him and his colleagues, but the part that went viral mainly highlighted the potential for future corruption.

'99 Percent Praise, 1 Percent Viral'

Deepke claimed that Wangchuk had commended the capabilities, leadership, and roles of CJP-affiliated youth during their discussions. He argued that approximately 99 percent of the positive aspects of the conversation were overlooked, with only a small portion going viral.

He further explained that if someone asks about a leader's future behavior, providing a definitive answer is not feasible. His argument was that just because someone is honest today does not mean that another person can guarantee their integrity in the future.

Discussion on CJP Leaders' Political Ambitions

Wangchuk also addressed the political ambitions of CJP-affiliated youth, including Abhijit Deepke, Sourav Das, and Ashutosh Ranka. He stated that aspiring to enter politics is not wrong in itself, but caution is necessary regarding the direction of any movement or student platform.

Based on his experiences, Wangchuk shared positive insights about these young leaders while indicating that their greatest challenge would be to remain connected to their core intentions and issues as they progress.

Deepke's Objection to the Viral Video

Deepke's primary objection lies in the incomplete representation of the video. He argued that extracting a single line from a lengthy conversation could alter its intended meaning.

He urged people to understand the context of the entire discussion, asserting that Wangchuk did not merely express concerns about CJP leaders but also praised their current roles and contributions.

Growing Discussion Between Movement and Politics

The conversation between Sonam Wangchuk and CJP leaders has emerged at a time when discussions about the student movement and its political implications are intensifying. The youth associated with the organization are raising their voices on issues related to education, examinations, alleged irregularities, and student concerns.

This has led to questions regarding the political roles and future directions of CJP leaders. Wangchuk's comments have further fueled the debate on whether the student movement could evolve into a broader political platform.

'No Guarantees for the Future'

The central message of Abhijit Deepke's response is that making definitive claims about anyone's future is challenging. He acknowledged Wangchuk's point, suggesting that people should continuously evaluate a leader or organization based on their actions and decisions rather than trusting them blindly.

In this ongoing controversy, it is crucial to consider both parties' statements in context. Wangchuk has made positive remarks about the current roles of CJP leaders while also refusing to guarantee the future. Meanwhile, Deepke has reiterated that no one can assure the future and that blind trust should be avoided.

Conclusion

Following Sonam Wangchuk's remarks, Abhijit Deepke has characterized the ensuing discussion not as a direct attack but rather as a logical commentary on the future. Deepke claims that the viral clip failed to capture the positive aspects of their conversation. The matter has now become a topic of discussion on social media, with ongoing debates regarding the political direction of CJP leaders.