Political Undertones in the Foundation Laying of a Mosque in West Bengal

In Murshidabad district of West Bengal, suspended TMC MLA Humayun Kabir today laid the foundation stone for a mosque designed in the style of the Babri Masjid in Beldanga. The event saw unprecedented security measures due to the anticipated large turnout. The administration's primary focus was to maintain smooth traffic flow on National Highway 12.

According to the organizers, two qazis arrived from Saudi Arabia as part of a special convoy, and in anticipation of a crowd of around 300,000, over 3,000 volunteers and nearly 3,000 police personnel were deployed. Reports indicate that the total expenditure for the event, including the large stage, food, logistics, and security, reached between 6 to 7 million rupees.

Humayun Kabir, who was recently suspended from the TMC for causing repeated embarrassment to the party, appeared to showcase his political strength through this event. He stated that not only a mosque would be built in Beldanga, but also a hospital, educational institutions, and guest houses for all communities.

The laying of the foundation stone for a mosque styled after the Babri Masjid in Murshidabad transcends mere religious significance; it is emerging as a political statement. Kabir's use of large crowds, external religious leaders, substantial spending, and provocative language is akin to playing with fire. Attempting to build popularity on the grounds of communal division poses a significant threat in a diverse nation like India.

This raises the question of what symbols we are promoting. When a mosque is proposed to be built in the style of the Babri Masjid or named after Babur, it goes beyond architectural style; it attempts to scratch the sensitive pages of history that still resonate in society. Babur, a medieval invader known for the destruction of temples, raises concerns about whether this initiative sends a message to Hindus that we are glorifying a symbol of historical pain. While every religion has the right to establish places of worship, should that right be exercised in a manner that undermines social harmony?

It is also noteworthy that the new mosque project in Ayodhya, which is legally sanctioned to be built peacefully, has been struggling for years due to slow progress and minimal funding. This intensifies the question of what the true objective is. Zafar Farooqi, president of the Indo-Islamic Cultural Foundation (IICF), has acknowledged that only about 3 crore rupees have been raised for the mosque in Ayodhya, compared to the estimated 65 crore rupees needed. If Humayun Kabir is genuinely concerned about the mosque, he should have supported the one being constructed under the Supreme Court's order instead of trying to gain political mileage and incite communal division.

Ultimately, the pride of any community in India lies not in repeating historical struggles but in building a new future. Whether it is a temple or a mosque, if their names, forms, language, or events divide society, we need to reflect on the direction we are heading. Respect religion, learn from history, but do not stoke the flames of emotions for political gain. This message is more relevant today than ever.