Political Turmoil Erupts Over Mehbooba Mufti's Controversial Statement on Kashmir Protests

The political landscape in Kashmir is heating up following Mehbooba Mufti's controversial remarks justifying the use of force by security forces. Her statements have drawn sharp criticism from various political factions, particularly the National Conference, which accused her of double standards. The discourse has revived painful memories from 2016, when protests led to significant violence and injuries due to pellet gun usage. As the PDP defends Mufti's comments, questions linger about the implications for democratic rights in Kashmir. This article delves into the unfolding political drama and its historical context.

By Narendra Chaudhary Jul 27, 2026, 14:22 IST

Political Reactions to Mehbooba Mufti's Statement

The issue of pellet gun usage during protests at Jantar Mantar has already ignited political tensions. Amidst this, a statement from former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister and PDP leader Mehbooba Mufti has stirred significant controversy in the valley's political landscape. Mehbooba justified the use of force by security forces in Kashmir as a necessary measure in the fight against terrorism, which led to accusations of her applying double standards. Her remarks not only reignited political debates but also brought back memories of the pellet gun incidents from 2016 and her infamous "milk and toffee" comment.

The Controversy Unfolds

The controversy began when Mehbooba Mufti stated that the situations in Delhi and Kashmir are distinct. She argued that security forces in Kashmir are combating terrorism, thus the circumstances cannot be equated with student protests in Delhi. This raises the question: if democratic protests are a right for every citizen, do the rights of Kashmiri youth differ? Does every Kashmiri who raises their voice against injustice automatically fall under the umbrella of terrorism?

National Conference's Sharp Critique

The ruling National Conference (NC) has sharply criticized Mehbooba's stance. In a social media post, the party sarcastically remarked, "If you are Kashmiri and protesting for your rights, then using force against you is justified. Bravo!" This comment directly targeted Mehbooba's alleged double standards. NC spokesperson Imran Nabi Dar further accused her of portraying every Kashmiri protester as a "terrorist." He expressed that her statement suggests a uniform view of children, students, and women, calling it "shameful" and a regrettable mindset for a former chief minister.

Calls for Apology and Reflection

Senior NC leader and legislator Tanvir Sadiq demanded a public apology from Mehbooba Mufti. He questioned whether those protesting against reservation or demanding basic amenities like water and electricity would also be labeled as terrorists. He emphasized that blurring the lines between democratic protest and terrorism is a dangerous ideology. Meanwhile, former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah stated that Mehbooba should have stayed home instead of justifying the misuse of power against Kashmiris.

Historical Context and Ongoing Pain

Mehbooba's statement has sparked controversy partly because it recalls the turmoil of 2016, following the death of Burhan Wani, which led to widespread violence and protests in the valley. At that time, Mehbooba was the chief minister, and the use of pellet guns resulted in hundreds of injuries, with many losing their eyesight permanently. Her earlier comment, "Were they going for milk and toffee?" remains a potent weapon against her by political opponents.

PDP's Defense and Ongoing Questions

In response, the PDP has categorically rejected these accusations. Party leader Waheed Para claimed that Mehbooba's statement was edited using artificial intelligence to misrepresent its context. He clarified that her intention was to highlight that the harsh laws and methods previously employed in Jammu and Kashmir are now being applied across the country. He cited laws like UAPA, which were once used in the valley, now being invoked in cases involving Delhi student leaders like Sharjeel Imam and Umar Khalid.

Lingering Doubts

However, the PDP's explanation raises further questions. If the statement was indeed misrepresented, why is there hesitation in releasing the complete, unedited video?