NCERT to Remove Controversial Judiciary Section from Textbooks

The NCERT has announced the removal of a controversial section from its Class 8 Social Science textbooks that discusses corruption in the judiciary. This decision follows strong objections from the Chief Justice of India, who emphasized the need to protect the reputation of the judiciary. The contentious chapter highlighted significant issues within the judicial system, including a staggering number of pending cases. The removal aims to address public concerns and restore confidence in the judicial institution. Read on to learn more about the implications of this decision and the details surrounding the controversy.

By Narendra Chaudhary Feb 25, 2026, 17:47 IST

Removal of Judiciary Content from NCERT Books

NCERT has decided to eliminate the contentious section regarding the judiciary from its textbooks. This decision follows a controversy surrounding a segment in the new Class 8 Social Science textbook, which mentions corruption within the judiciary. Chief Justice of India, N.V. Ramana, expressed strong objections to this content, leading to reports that NCERT will remove this section from its books.

Details of the Controversy
The decision to remove the controversial judiciary section from the Class 8 NCERT textbook comes amid ongoing debates. The issue arose from a chapter discussing the judiciary, where corruption was highlighted. The mention of corruption in the judiciary has upset Chief Justice Ramana, who stated that he would not allow anyone to tarnish the institution's reputation.

Background of the Issue
The controversy began with the release of the updated Class 8 Social Science textbook by NCERT. This new edition includes a chapter that discusses corruption in the judiciary, detailing the weaknesses of the judicial system and the backlog of cases. It cites staggering figures, including approximately 53.3 million pending cases across various courts, with 81,000 in the Supreme Court, 6.24 million in High Courts, and around 47 million in District and Subordinate Courts. Additionally, it addresses public perceptions and concerns regarding access to justice, particularly for the underprivileged.