×

Intensified Military Actions by the US and Israel Against Iran

The recent military strikes by the US and Israel against Iran have escalated tensions in the Middle East, with significant implications for global energy markets and geopolitical dynamics. Former President Trump announced the operations aimed at dismantling Iran's nuclear capabilities, while Iran retaliated swiftly. The situation raises concerns about broader geopolitical strategies, particularly in relation to China and oil supply routes. As the conflict unfolds, the potential for further escalation remains high, with warnings of severe repercussions for the region and beyond.
 

Escalation of Conflict in the Middle East


On Saturday, the United States and Israel initiated extensive military operations targeting Iran, marking a significant escalation in a conflict that has persisted in the Middle East for many years. In a video shared on Truth Social on February 28, former President Donald Trump announced the commencement of what he termed "major combat operations." He stated that the objective of this military campaign is to dismantle Iran's nuclear capabilities, eliminate its ballistic missile production, and ultimately facilitate regime change. Trump emphasized, "We will obliterate their missile infrastructure and destroy their navy. Our goal is to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons." The military strikes, dubbed Operation 'Epic Fury', targeted nuclear sites, missile installations, naval assets, and residences of high-ranking Iranian officials. Iranian state media reported that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader, was killed in these strikes.


Following this, Trump vowed that the bombing would persist "uninterrupted throughout the week or as long as necessary." In retaliation, Iran launched missiles at American military bases in the region and at Israel, with additional strikes reported across the Gulf, affecting nations such as Qatar, the UAE, Bahrain, and Saudi Arabia. Iranian officials claimed that the counterattacks resulted in civilian casualties, including the deaths of over 100 schoolgirls near a military site.



Justifying the Military Offensive

Framing the Case for War


US officials characterized the military offensive as a preemptive action aimed at neutralizing an imminent threat posed by Iran's nuclear and missile capabilities. In his address, Trump accused Iran of spurning opportunities to abandon its nuclear ambitions and of rebuilding its program following previous strikes by the US and Israel in June 2025. He claimed that Iran was developing long-range missiles that could reach Europe, US forces stationed abroad, and potentially the US mainland. Trump referenced historical grievances in US-Iran relations, including the 1979 seizure of the American Embassy in Tehran and the 1983 bombing of US Marine barracks in Beirut, which resulted in the deaths of 241 service members. He urged Iranian forces to surrender for "complete immunity" or face "certain death," and called on the Iranian populace to "take control of your government" once military objectives were met. This decision followed the failure of last-minute diplomatic efforts and came months after widespread protests in Iran that were suppressed by the government.


Geopolitical Implications

A Broader Calculation


While the administration's rationale has focused on nuclear nonproliferation and regional stability, some geopolitical analysts suggest that a broader competition with China may be a significant underlying factor. An analyst from Altas World News noted that this military campaign could provide the US with leverage over Beijing by tightening control over global oil supply routes. "If there were ever a master strategist in modern American statecraft, it had to be President Donald Trump and his administration," the analyst stated. They argued that restricting oil flows from countries like Venezuela and Iran could indirectly pressure China, which imports over 10 million barrels of oil daily and is a major buyer of Iranian oil exports. "On the surface, US actions against Iran seem nuclear-related, but strategically, they are about energy leverage," the analysis concluded. "Imagine the impact on China if its key energy supply routes fall under American control. This would create pressure without direct conflict."


Impact on Global Energy Markets

Oil, Shipping and Global Risk


The military actions have already affected energy markets significantly. Shipping traffic through the Strait of Hormuz has sharply declined after warnings from Iran's Revolutionary Guards that vessels are prohibited from passing. Approximately 20 million barrels of oil per day transit this narrow waterway, including exports from Saudi Arabia, Iraq, the UAE, Kuwait, and Qatar. China depends on this route for about half of its crude oil imports. Analysts have cautioned that even minor disruptions could drive oil prices above $100 per barrel, while a prolonged closure could lead to recessionary pressures extending beyond the region. The situation has been exacerbated by airspace closures and rising insurance costs for shipping. Russia condemned the strikes as "unprovoked aggression," and several European leaders expressed concern over the potential for a wider conflict. Trump warned Tehran against further escalation, pledging retaliation "with unprecedented force."