India Challenges Pakistan's Claims on Jammu and Kashmir at UN

In a recent session at the UN Human Rights Council, India decisively countered Pakistan's allegations regarding Jammu and Kashmir. India's First Secretary Anupama Singh highlighted the stark contrast between the two nations, emphasizing Pakistan's reliance on international loans while India showcases democratic progress. Singh's remarks underscored the rejection of terrorism and separatism by the people of Jammu and Kashmir, who are now focused on development and stability. As the international community grows weary of Pakistan's outdated rhetoric, India continues to assert its legal stance on the region's integration. This article delves into the key points raised during the session and the implications for both nations.

By Narendra Chaudhary Feb 27, 2026, 19:22 IST

India Responds to Pakistan's Allegations at the UN

Once again, Pakistan's credibility was questioned on the global stage as it attempted to blame India over the Jammu and Kashmir issue. However, India countered with such factual clarity that Islamabad's rhetoric fell flat. During the high-level segment of the 61st regular session of the UN Human Rights Council, India's First Secretary Anupama Singh delivered a response that effectively held a mirror to Pakistan's claims.

India firmly stated that Pakistan exists in a 'fantasy world.' It is ironic for a nation whose economy relies on international loans to lecture others on democracy and human rights. The reality is that the development budget for Jammu and Kashmir is more than double the relief package Pakistan has sought from the IMF, highlighting the stark contrast between the two nations' progress.

Anupama Singh pointed out that Pakistan struggles to accept the strengthening of democracy in Jammu and Kashmir. The record voter turnout in recent Lok Sabha and Assembly elections demonstrates that the local populace has rejected the ideologies of terrorism and separatism, which Pakistan has supported for decades. The people of the valley now seek development, employment, and stability, and the Indian government is committed to fulfilling these aspirations.

Referring to comments made by Pakistan and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), she asserted that India is compelled to exercise its right to respond. India categorically rejects these allegations. It is peculiar to receive lessons on democracy from a country where civilian governments rarely complete their terms. She emphasized that if the Chenab Rail Bridge, inaugurated last year, is deemed fake, then Pakistan is indeed living in a state of delusion.

Singh criticized the OIC for echoing Pakistan's propaganda, suggesting that it has been unduly influenced by one of its members. She remarked that Pakistan's continuous disinformation now appears to be fueled by jealousy. While India does not wish to give undue importance to such propaganda, it will address key points and refute them with facts. She reiterated that no amount of fabricated statements or audacious propaganda can alter the undeniable fact that Jammu and Kashmir's integration into India is entirely legal and irreversible, in accordance with the Indian Independence Act (1947) and international law.

In fact, the only outstanding dispute regarding this region is Pakistan's illegal occupation of Indian territories. India calls upon Pakistan to vacate these areas it has forcibly occupied.

Despite the OIC aligning with Pakistan's narrative, the international community is no longer swayed by these outdated arguments. Pakistan must realize that hollow rhetoric on global platforms will not resolve its internal economic and political issues. It would be wiser for Pakistan to channel its energy into improving the future of its citizens rather than exporting terrorism. While India moves forward with confidence, Pakistan must first confront the realities within its own borders. This is the truth, and it reflects Pakistan's true standing.