High Court Critiques Crowd Management in Mathura-Vrindavan

The Allahabad High Court has criticized the crowd management practices in Mathura-Vrindavan, pointing out their lack of scientific basis and limited focus on traffic control. Justice Vinod Diwakar has called for detailed affidavits from local authorities following recent stampedes during festivals. The court also highlighted the unique nature of religious gatherings and the need for effective crowd control measures. Additionally, concerns were raised regarding illegal constructions in the area, with the court stressing the importance of long-term urban planning to address these issues effectively. This article delves into the court's observations and recommendations.

By Narendra Chaudhary Aug 2, 2026, 07:09 IST

Court's Observations on Crowd Control

Prayagraj, August 1 - The Allahabad High Court has expressed concerns regarding the crowd management strategies in Mathura-Vrindavan, stating that they lack a scientific basis and primarily focus on traffic management. The court has provided several recommendations to the state government regarding crowd control measures. Justice Vinod Diwakar took note of recent stampedes during festivals like Holi and has summoned detailed affidavits from the Vice Chairman of the Mathura-Vrindavan Development Authority, the District Magistrate, the Municipal Commissioner, and the Senior Superintendent of Police.

Religious Gatherings Require Special Attention

The court highlighted that religious gatherings differ from political rallies and sports events, as the emotional connection often leads devotees to be less vigilant about potential dangers. Citing studies on crowd dynamics, the court noted that personal control diminishes when the density reaches four to five people per square meter, while six to seven can create suffocating conditions. This statement was made during the hearing of a case related to an alleged illegal construction in Vrindavan.

Concerns Over Illegal Constructions

The petitioner claimed that out of 23 illegal constructions, action was taken against only a few. According to the affidavit from the Mathura-Vrindavan Development Authority, 2,453 notices were issued between 2021-22 and 2025-26, with demolition orders passed in 700 cases, but only 323 were acted upon. The authority also reported that 104 properties were sealed during this period.

Need for Long-Term Urban Planning

The court emphasized the necessity for long-term urban planning in religiously significant towns like Mathura, Ayodhya, Varanasi, and Chitrakoot. It stated that addressing the issue of illegal constructions at pilgrimage sites requires not only stringent laws but also a strong institutional will.