Government Proposes Amendments to Foreign Contribution Regulation Bill
Introduction of the Amendment Bill
On Wednesday, the Union government presented the 2026 Foreign Contribution Regulation Amendment Bill in the Lok Sabha.
Government's Justification
During the parliamentary session, Union Minister of State for Home Nityanand Rai stated that the proposed changes would empower the government to take action against organizations that misuse foreign funding for activities like forced religious conversions or actions that contradict the Constitution and national interests.
Opposition's Concerns
Three members from the Opposition voiced their objections to the bill, labeling it as 'dangerous' and 'draconian.'
To receive foreign funds, non-profit organizations must register under the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act.
Key Provisions of the Amendment
The amendment aims to fill 'operational and legal gaps' in the 2010 Act, especially regarding organizations whose registrations have been canceled or have expired.
A significant provision allows the government to take control of an NGO's foreign funds and assets if its FCRA registration lapses. Under this framework, such assets will temporarily be managed by a government-appointed 'designated authority.' If the organization does not restore its registration, this control will become permanent, allowing the authority to utilize, transfer, or dispose of these assets for 'public purposes.'
Additionally, the bill enforces stricter regulations during registration suspensions, prohibiting NGOs from transferring or selling assets generated from foreign funds without prior approval from the central government.
Statistics on NGO Registrations
From 2016-’17 to 2021-’22, over 6,600 NGOs lost their FCRA licenses, as reported to Parliament in December 2022. In 2023, the government disclosed that 13,520 registered non-profits had received a total of Rs 55,741.5 crore in foreign contributions between 2019-’20 and 2021-’22.
Criticism from Opposition MPs
Congress MP Manish Tewari criticized the amendment bill for granting 'sweeping and disproportionate powers' to the executive without sufficient constitutional protections.
His party colleague GK Padavi expressed concerns that the bill would further limit democratic space, leaving civil society in a state of 'regulatory uncertainty and fear of punitive action.'
Trinamool Congress MP Pratima Mandal argued that the bill centralizes excessive power within the Union government.