Debate Erupts Over Police Actions During NEET Protest March
The recent NEET protest march has sparked significant debate regarding police actions and the rights of demonstrators. Former police commissioner OP Mishra provides insights into the complexities of crowd control and the legal frameworks governing protests. As tensions escalated during the march, questions arose about the appropriateness of police responses and the implications for civil rights. This article delves into the nuances of the situation, exploring the balance between maintaining order and respecting citizens' rights to protest. Discover the full analysis and the critical perspectives shared by Mishra in this engaging discussion.
Aug 5, 2026, 16:06 IST
Violence at Parliament March Sparks Controversy
The recent violence during the 'Parliament March' called by the Cockroach People's Party (CJP) in protest against alleged irregularities in the NEET examination has reignited discussions about police actions and the rights of demonstrators. Protesters claim that law enforcement used excessive force and pellet guns, while the police argue that their response was necessary due to the crowd's aggression and the breaching of barricades. In a special segment of a news show, former Joint Police Commissioner (Ex-IPS) OP Mishra shared his insights on this incident, crowd control protocols, and the evolving nature of protests in Indian politics.
Protests and Police Boundaries: When the 'Lakshman Rekha' is Crossed
According to OP Mishra, the Constitution grants citizens the right to peaceful protests, and it is the police's primary duty to safeguard this right. However, in sensitive areas like New Delhi, where institutions such as the Parliament and the Presidential Palace are located, strict security measures are enforced. Analyzing the CJP's demonstration, he noted that issues arose when protesters crossed pre-established conditions and the agreed boundaries with the police. Tensions escalated when attempts were made to forcefully advance towards restricted areas like the Parliament.
Use of Force and Regulations: What Do the Rules Say?
Responding to criticisms of police actions, Mishra clarified that the use of force by law enforcement is neither sudden nor arbitrary. There exists a written Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for crowd control, which includes a 'graded response':
First Stage: Warning via loudspeaker
Second Stage: Use of water cannons
Third Stage: Lathi charge
Final Stage: Deployment of tear gas
He emphasized that when a violent crowd breaks through barricades, the on-site officers must make tough decisions to protect public property and lives.
First Stage: Warning via loudspeaker
Second Stage: Use of water cannons
Third Stage: Lathi charge
Final Stage: Deployment of tear gas
He emphasized that when a violent crowd breaks through barricades, the on-site officers must make tough decisions to protect public property and lives.
Plainclothes Officers and Social Media's 'Half-Truths'
Regarding individuals in plain clothes wielding sticks during the protest, Mishra explained that various intelligence and security wings of the police operate in civilian attire. However, it is incorrect to assume that every person carrying a stick in the crowd is a police officer; a fair investigation is essential. Commenting on social media and viral videos lasting 15-20 seconds, he stated that as a disciplined force, the police cannot respond to every video immediately. Official channels are used to counter misinformation.
Watch the Full Discussion