Anna Hazare Urges Government to Engage with Sonam Wangchuk Amid Ongoing Hunger Strike
Call for Dialogue with Sonam Wangchuk
On Saturday, social activist Anna Hazare appealed to the central government to engage in discussions with educator Sonam Wangchuk. He emphasized the importance of addressing Wangchuk's demands, especially after he was taken to Safdarjung Hospital by Delhi police for medical treatment. Hazare remarked that the government should not test Wangchuk's patience, suggesting that there is no harm in having a conversation, regardless of whether the response is affirmative or negative. Wangchuk is currently on a hunger strike, which marks its 21st day, demanding the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan in connection with the NEET paper leak incident.
This appeal from Hazare comes years after his own hunger strike in Delhi, which aimed at advocating for the Lokpal law and significantly impacted the UPA government in 2011.
Health Concerns and Police Actions
According to police reports, Wangchuk was hospitalized under a directive from the Delhi High Court to monitor his health. However, Abhijit Dipke from the Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP) claimed that the climate activist was forcibly taken. Some students also alleged that they faced police brutality at the protest site. CJP protesters accused police officers of arriving at Jantar Mantar and posing as a medical team. A protester reported that volunteers were ordered to step aside during the incident. Saurav Das, the main spokesperson for CJP, alleged that the Delhi police misinterpreted the High Court's instructions when taking Wangchuk to the hospital, labeling the detention as contempt of court.
The Delhi High Court had previously instructed that Wangchuk's health should be monitored, and any actions should only be taken if his condition deteriorated. The medical team checks on him two to three times daily, and he regularly posts updates about his health, which has remained stable. The police's interpretation of the court order was deemed incorrect, and the detention was considered a violation of the court's directive.