Protests Erupt in Kenya Over Controversial US-Backed Ebola Treatment Center

In Kenya, protests erupted against a proposed US-backed Ebola treatment center, resulting in the tragic deaths of two individuals. Local opposition stems from fears of increased Ebola transmission risks, despite no reported cases in the country. The High Court has temporarily halted the project, demanding more information from the government. President Ruto defends the agreement, citing a long-standing partnership with the US. As tensions rise and legal challenges continue, the future of the facility remains uncertain amidst ongoing health concerns in the region.

By Narendra Chaudhary Jun 2, 2026, 22:45 IST

Violence Erupts Amid Protests

Local reports indicate that two people lost their lives during protests in central Kenya against a disputed US-supported initiative to establish an Ebola isolation facility at a military base near Nanyuki. On Monday, a large crowd took to the streets to voice their opposition to the proposed 50-bed treatment center at Laikipia Airbase, leading to tragic outcomes. Security forces deployed tear gas in response to demonstrators who blocked roads, ignited tires, and clashed with authorities. One victim was reportedly shot near the military installation while the protests were ongoing. Community leader Patrick Wahome informed local media that the individual was returning home after work when he was struck by gunfire and later succumbed to his injuries at the hospital. The second victim was transported to the same hospital by military personnel but was pronounced dead upon arrival. The authorities have not provided any details regarding the circumstances of these deaths, and both bodies are currently held at the hospital morgue, showing signs of gunshot wounds. Police have yet to confirm the fatalities, with a spokesperson stating he was unaware of any deaths related to the protests.

Opposition to the Ebola Center

The proposed US-operated Ebola treatment center at Laikipia Airbase has sparked significant unrest. The facility is intended to treat American citizens affected by the ongoing Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, staffed by US medical professionals. However, local residents, health organizations, and civil society groups have voiced strong objections, fearing that the center could heighten the risk of Ebola transmission within Kenya, where no cases have been reported.

Recently, Kenya's High Court temporarily halted the project following a petition from a rights organization, which argued that the facility posed serious public health risks. The court has since extended the suspension and demanded further information from the government regarding the proposed center.

Government's Stance

President William Ruto has defended the agreement, asserting that the government thoroughly evaluated the potential risks before endorsing the US initiative. He stated that the request for the center was made directly by former President Donald Trump, emphasizing the long-standing friendship between the two nations. Ruto remarked, "It was an agreement with friends who have walked with Kenya for decades, so I gave the go-ahead when President Trump asked Kenya to support them by having a center in Laikipia Airbase." He reassured the public that stringent measures are in place to safeguard health and urged citizens and political figures not to politicize the issue, asserting, "Our government is accountable. We know what we're doing."

Ongoing Tensions

Despite the court's restraining order, reports suggest that military aircraft continue to operate at the airbase, raising concerns that preparations for the facility may still be underway. Medical organizations, including the Kenyan physicians' union, have expressed their disapproval of the plan, arguing that housing Ebola patients could unnecessarily endanger nearby communities. This controversy unfolds as health officials across Africa remain vigilant due to the latest Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where efforts to contain the virus are ongoing. With legal challenges persisting and public dissent increasing, the future of the proposed facility remains uncertain.