Controversy Surrounds Shiv Thakare's Victory in The 50

The finale of The 50 has concluded, but the discussions surrounding Shiv Thakare's victory continue. Lovekesh Kataria questions the motives behind Prince Narula's decision to hand over his finale ticket to Shiv, suggesting it was a strategic move rather than a selfless act. In contrast, Shiv maintains that the gesture was rooted in their strong bond. This divergence in perspectives raises intriguing questions about loyalty and strategy in competitive environments. What do you think? Join the conversation and share your opinion.

By Narendra Chaudhary Mar 25, 2026, 11:26 IST

The Aftermath of The 50's Finale

Although the finale of The 50 has concluded, discussions about the show continue to spark interest. Shiv Thakare was declared the winner, yet many have raised questions regarding the circumstances of his victory. In a recent interview with a media outlet, Lovekesh Kataria shared his thoughts on the pivotal moment when Prince Narula handed his finale ticket to Shiv. While some interpreted this act as a gesture of loyalty, Lovekesh suggests it may have been a strategic decision, raising doubts about Prince's true intentions.

Lovekesh Kataria's Perspective on Prince's Decision

Lovekesh Kataria thinks Prince got scared of losing

In his conversation with the media, Lovekesh candidly expressed his views on the situation. He recounted his reaction upon learning that Prince had given his finale ticket to Shiv, implying that the gesture was more tactical than altruistic. He remarked, “I was shocked. I was sitting with my friends in Mumbai when I heard that Prince gave his finale ticket to Shiv. I said, Prince, you’re very smart. You knew I would lose to Faizu in the finale, so you gave the ticket to Shiv beforehand. Your position stays strong and the job gets done without any risk.”

Questioning the Nature of Sacrifice

Lovekesh does not buy 'balidaan' angle

Lovekesh elaborated that Prince's ongoing success might have influenced his choice. He suggested that the decision was likely based on a strategic understanding of the game rather than genuine loyalty. He stated, “It was quite a smart move because he has been on a winning streak, so somewhere he might have felt he could lose. That’s probably why he gave the ticket. That’s my opinion.” He further questioned the concept of sacrifice in a competitive environment, arguing that true sacrifice is not calculated. “If you are making a sacrifice at such a crucial moment, it’s a very calculated one. Sacrifice is never calculated; it comes from the heart,” he concluded.

Contrasting Views on Prince's Actions

In a separate interview, Shiv Thakare offered a different perspective on the same incident, asserting that Prince's decision was premeditated due to their close relationship. He stated, “It was decided even before the show began that Prince, who is like my brother, would not compete in the finale. Everyone has their own way.” The differing opinions between Shiv and Lovekesh regarding Prince Narula's actions raise questions about the nature of loyalty and strategy in competitive settings. What do you think? Share your thoughts @ZoomTV on X.