×

Potential 66% Salary Increase for Central Government Employees: Key Proposal Ahead of 8th Pay Commission

As the 8th Central Pay Commission approaches, a significant proposal to expand the 'family unit' for minimum wage calculations could lead to a 66% increase in salaries for central government employees and pensioners. Unions are advocating for this change, arguing that the current model does not reflect modern household structures. If accepted, this adjustment could impact over 1.2 crore individuals, affecting minimum salaries, fitment factors, and pensions. The discussions are ongoing, and the outcome remains uncertain, but the implications of this proposal could be profound.
 

Significant Changes Proposed for Salary Calculations


As the 8th Central Pay Commission approaches, a pivotal demand is emerging that could transform how salaries are calculated for central government employees and pensioners. Unions are advocating for an expansion of the 'family unit' used in minimum wage assessments, which could mathematically result in a staggering 66% increase in the minimum basic salary.


The National Council (Staff Side) of the Joint Consultative Machinery (NC-JCM) is currently working on its Master Memorandum, making this proposal a focal point of the upcoming pay revision discussions.


Why the 66% Increase is Gaining Attention


The NC-JCM has initiated discussions to finalize a comprehensive set of demands for the 8th Pay Commission. Various employee organizations, including those from the railway, postal, defense, and NPS sectors, have previously submitted their recommendations. However, many expressed that their primary concerns were not adequately addressed in the official Terms of Reference released in November 2025.


As talks progress, one proposal has emerged as particularly significant: modifying the family unit used for minimum pay calculations. This adjustment could impact over 1.2 crore employees and pensioners, affecting minimum salaries, fitment factors, allowances, and pensions.


Understanding the Family Unit Formula


Historically, minimum salary calculations have been based on the consumption needs of a standard family. The 7th Pay Commission utilized a model derived from Dr. Wallace Aykroyd’s formula, which estimates living wages based on essential needs such as:


  • Nutritional needs (approximately 2,700 calories per adult)
  • Clothing requirements
  • Housing expenses


Using this framework, the 7th Pay Commission considered three consumption units, representing the employee, their spouse, and children, adjusted through consumption coefficients. This formed the basis for determining minimum pay.


Current Demands from Employee Unions


Unions are now advocating for the family unit to be expanded from three to five units by including dependent parents. Since minimum salary is calculated as a multiple of consumption units, increasing the units alters the base calculation: 5 ÷ 3 = 1.66. This adjustment implies that the base value for determining minimum salary would increase by approximately 66.67%. Consequently, employee organizations argue that adopting the five-unit model could lead to a 66% rise in the minimum basic salary benchmark.


Impact on Minimum Basic Pay


Currently, the minimum basic pay under the 7th Pay Commission stands at ₹18,000. Employee organizations are now requesting:


  • A minimum pay of around ₹54,000
  • A fitment factor of up to 3.25 (compared to the previous 2.57)
  • An annual increment of approximately 7%
  • The restoration of the Old Pension Scheme (OPS)


While factors like inflation, the merger of Dearness Allowance, and fiscal considerations will influence the final figures, the expansion of the family unit serves as the structural basis for a higher minimum salary demand. An increase in the base calculation would elevate the entire pay matrix.


Fitment Factor Implications


The fitment factor acts as a multiplier for revising existing basic pay:


  • 7th Pay Commission fitment factor: 2.57
  • Current demand: 3.25 or higher


A higher consumption-unit model bolsters the case for a larger fitment factor, as the foundational minimum wage itself would be elevated.


Significance for Pensioners


This proposal is equally crucial for pensioners. Basic pensions are typically calculated as 50% of the last drawn basic pay. Therefore, if the minimum salary rises due to the revised formula, pension payouts would also increase accordingly. This is why pensioner associations are closely monitoring the ongoing discussions.


Rationale Behind Union Demands


Employee unions argue that the current three-unit model fails to reflect the realities of modern household structures. Key points raised include:


  • Increasing cost of living
  • Financial obligations towards dependent parents
  • Inflation-driven pressures on household expenses
  • The necessity for structural revisions rather than mere incremental pay increases


They assert that the 8th Pay Commission should provide a substantial reset in base pay rather than just routine adjustments.


Current Status of Discussions


The NC-JCM Staff Side is in the process of compiling demands from various departments to create a unified Master Memorandum that encompasses:


  • Expansion of the family unit
  • Revision of the fitment factor
  • Increase in minimum pay
  • Pension parity
  • Allowances and risk-based compensation


It remains uncertain whether the government will accept the five-unit proposal. However, if approved, the ramifications could extend across salary structures, pensions, and allowances.


Conclusion


The much-discussed 66% increase is not merely a random figure; it stems from a mathematical adjustment in the minimum wage formula. If the family unit expands from three to five:


  • The base salary benchmark could rise by approximately 66%
  • Justification for a higher fitment factor would be strengthened
  • Minimum pay demands could approach ₹54,000
  • Pension payouts may increase proportionally


For over 1.2 crore employees and pensioners, this shift in formula could represent one of the most significant decisions of the 8th Pay Commission. The central question now is whether the government will agree to revise the family-unit framework that underlies pay calculations.