Legal Controversy Surrounds Upcoming Film 'Haq' Based on Shah Bano Case
Film 'Haq' Faces Legal Challenges Ahead of Release
The film 'Haq', featuring Emraan Hashmi and Yami Gautam, has found itself embroiled in a legal dispute just days before its release. The movie is reportedly centered around the Shah Bano case, but the family of Shah Bano has accused the filmmakers of using personal details without consent, thereby violating their privacy.
According to reports, Shah Bano's daughter, Siddika Begum, has filed a petition with the Indore bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, seeking to halt the film's release scheduled for November 7. Siddika's lawyer, Tausif Warsi, stated that the filmmakers neither sought the family's approval nor requested permission to use life-based events.
Additionally, Shah Bano's grandson, Zubair Ahmed Khan, has expressed his objections, stating that he learned about the film only after watching the teaser, which he claims distorts several facts. He emphasized that this is a personal matter that is now being commercially exploited.
On the other hand, the production team has clarified that the film is not entirely based on real events and includes dramatic adaptations. The producer's lawyer, Ajay Bagdia, mentioned that a disclaimer at the beginning of the film indicates it is inspired by the Shah Bano case and the book titled 'Bano, Daughter of India.'
It is important to note that the Shah Bano case was a landmark decision in 1985 concerning women's rights and alimony laws in India. The Supreme Court ruled that Shah Bano was entitled to alimony from her ex-husband, but this decision was later nullified by the Rajiv Gandhi government through legislation.
Directed by Surpan S Verma, 'Haq' stars Emraan Hashmi and Yami Gautam in lead roles. The film is produced under the banner of Jungle Pictures, with Vinay Jain, Vishal Gurnani, Juhi Parekh Mehta, and Harman Baweja as producers. The ongoing controversy not only complicates legal matters but also raises questions about whether the court will impose a ban, given the family's objections have reached judicial authorities.
